That's just crazy talk from crazy people, I rate Holyfield because of those wins. The only thing I can think of is it's because he went 1-2 with Bowe. Tyson still had a gas in the tank for Holyfield, a solid win. Here's my top 15 ATG HW's. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
its tricky with holyfield. because you can use bowe and tyson but he sill lost twice to bowe and the only time he did beat bowe was in the fan man fight which was controverialy because of the circumstances and some thought bowe won that fight too. the tyson fights are his best wins even thought tyson was no longer what he use to, as you said, he still had some left in the tank.
it simply because he was never a dominant heavyweight like a tyson, or lewis was. although he probably does reate above tyson since tyson couldnt keep it together long enough to really seperate himself from the rest.
I'd rate Holyfield above Tyson and Lewis. I do think going 1-2 with Bowe taints his record a bit. But in that way he gets penalized for taking on a tough opponent for the third time. He could have stayed at 1-1. I can think of heavyweights who rank higher who were openly ducking tough challenges when they got to that age (Holmes, for example). People say he wasn't dominant but I dont see that as necessarily a bad thing. He lacked the KO artist style of Tyson, sure. But Lennox Lewis looked less than convincing in a lot of fights too. Holyfield met a lot of fighters who were motivated and came to win (no doubt encouraged by the fact that Holyfield started out as a light-heavy) - men like Dokes and Mercer, who may have had their very best career fights against Holyfield, they fought out of their skins. It's a crapshoot really as to where he ranks against Lewis. Or even Tyson for that matter. It boils down to opinion. There's not much seperating them.
Which performances (besides Ruddock)? He was certainly sloppy in the first Rahman fight, but it was more from just being lazy, technically he was all over the place pre Steward, mostly a mess with his balance.
From what I understand The courts ordered it and it was money used to pay Lewis and his handlers for revenues lost for not getting the title shot.
Like quite a few posters on here, i was around when all this was going on. And while camps of boths sides can make claim and counterclaim, the general consensus at the time was that Tysons camp were reluctant to fight Lewis for whatever reasons. I dont blame tyson for taking easy money fights as it makes more sense to earn 30-50million fighting a few guys that he'd be really confident of KOing rather than take a chance against a guy who was capable of beating him (in his eyes) for substantially less money. Don King also features heavily here and we all know where his priorities lay. Also the fact that Lewis took him to court, regardless of the official reason for the 4mill awarded, kinda swayed public opinion towards Lewis. If ever there was a perfect case of boxing politics then this was as good an example there is. As far as Bowe is concerned, i dont think that was politics. I think that he just didnt fancy the fight and lost a lot of respect when he put the belt in the bin. True fight fans are not stupid and seen through that masquarade. Just my two-cents.
Here's my question: Does Tyson get any credit for his knockout of Larry Holmes? What's considered his best victory? Berbick? Spinks? Does he have any? Or is he so highly rated (relatively) because of his dominance of a weak division?
Tyson is not given the credit due in my opinion. He didnt dominate a weak division either, he just made a solid division look weak because he was so dominating. A weak division is this current one, and the second half of the 90's.
how can you say it ? the second half of the 90's had : vitali klitschko , wladimir klitschko , lennox lewis , david tua , chris byrd , evander holyfield , mike tyson , ike ibeabuchi (although just 2 important fights) , oliver McCall , Riddick Bowe lesser , but still good : kirk johnson , george foreman , larry holmes (these 2 are in the 'lesser' part b/c they were old) , michael grant , lance whitaker , orlin norris , tony tucker (old) and more the time around 1992-2002 was the strongest h2h SHW division ever , if anything. seeing this claim coming from you is a surprise
I said the second half of the 90's and a lot of the fighters you mentioned were non factors during that time.
Larry Holmes, Riddick Bowe, George Foreman, and Tyson for the most part. Ibeabuchi fought Tua and Byrd, not in the title mix nor was Mcall, and the Klitschkos didnt become realistic factors in the main title mix until late 99 early part of 2000.