1996 - "Tyson Ducked Lewis" ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Mar 3, 2010.


  1. duran duran

    duran duran Member Full Member

    435
    10
    Feb 10, 2010
    my2sense how was it an outright lie that ruddock was finished by the time of the lewis fight what did ruddock do after the tyson fights ? lewis in 92 was not that good watch the problems a shot tucker and bruno gave him as soon as he fought a live opponent at their peak mccall he was exposed as a novice i dont want to sound disparraging of lewis but has any top class heavyweight ever beat so many has beens like lewis has tyson holyfield ruddock tucker etc the list goes on they were either shot tyson or fading fast holyfield
     
  2. Chopper

    Chopper Cant be stopped Full Member

    80
    0
    Mar 11, 2010
    Will people be sayin Shane is duckin Berto because he got paid step aside money for the Mayweather fight to become a reality? Its the same thing. Step aside money doesn't mean your duckin anyone. I'm a Lewis supporter I may add.
     
  3. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    91
    Aug 21, 2008
    But Ruddock's career turning point was against Lewis, not Tyson. Heading into the Lewis fight he was still as **** hot as ever.
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    91
    Aug 21, 2008
    The same thing he was doing before the fights - beating ex-champs and rising contenders.

    He'd already beaten a "live/peak" opponent when he beat Gary Mason before he even he even won the title; and the "live" McCall you refer to was beaten by the "shot" Tucker and Bruno that you dismiss.
     
  5. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    212
    Feb 5, 2005

    Kind of my thoughts on this too. You can't really tell when Ruddock's turning point was, because Lewis beat him so convincingly any version of Ruddock would have been blown out. It wasn't a matter of whether or not Ruddock was shot, the issue is that Lewis was able to tag him cleanly and no version either pre or post Tyson could have stood up to those shots. The only real question is whether or not pre-tyson Ruddock could have avoided getting hit cleanly, and I don't know the answer to that question, but I suspect not.
     
  6. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    No it wasnt, it was against Tyson who at that time was a better fighter than that version of Lewis by most peoples account. Tyson X2, Lewis, Morrison would certainly set the trend of decline.
     
  7. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    91
    Aug 21, 2008
    The Tyson fights didn't do anything to diminish Ruddock's reputation or standing in the division, and if anything only enhanced it. Hence, he was a sizable favorite to beat Lewis even on his home turf in England.

    Nothing "turned" for Ruddock until after Lewis demolished him.

    No they don't, because he had fights in between that clearly showed when and how he was declining or not.
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    I disagree.
    Lewis may have had flaws around that time generally, (say, '91 - '94) but Lewis of the Ruddock in particular put on one of his most clinical and flawless performances of his entire career, including everything he did later.

    Tyson was actually judged as being "washed-up" or certainly "way off his best" off of the Ruddock fights at the time. But a year later he was in jail, the champion Holyfield was coming off some ordinary or unimpressive performances, and therefore the Tyson myth was alive and well.
    Critics of Holyfield, and critics of Bowe and Lewis, used the shadow of incarcerated Tyson against them, but they conveniently forgot that Tyson was already 2 or 3 years into his decline when he last fought.
     
  9. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    It certainly showed one fighter taking a severe beating over two fights. Doesnt take a rocket scientist to know what kind of affect that has on a fighter after. It reduces your punch resistance and ability to see punches coming.

    Losing more consistently would be a tunring point. The Lewis loss was just more proof he was washed up. Morrison was the nail in the coffin.
    One fight against a washed up former champ who hadnt had a meaningful win in eight years, and another against a small fighter who had no meaningful wins ever, proved nothing really.
    I would say Dokes and Smith were Morrison caliber opponents, wouldnt you? Maybe Dokes a little better?
     
  10. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Lewis wasnt even on the radar as anything more than an up and coming challenger for the title, thats why Ruddock was favored as he had just challenged for the #1 contender spot and Lewis was unproven at that level, but that didnt change the fact Ruddock had just come off of two wars with Tyson and as you said looked like he got hit by a truck coming off the second fight. I think you would agree with me that in most cases the affects of that type of punishment are not favorable to a fighters future.:p
    Tyson wasnt considered washed up, and was certainly more highly regarded than Lennox Lewis, especially after Lewis went on to get knocked out by one of his sparring partners.
    The Ruddock fight was impressive, but both fighters actions thereafter certainly put things in proper perspective for me.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    Of course Tyson was more highly regarded and more proven, but that's part of the point - he was living off of past glory and reputation.

    I have several Tyson-Ruddock 2 reviews and commentary in magazines throughout 1991, and plenty of observers are saying "I think he's washed-up", "he might be washed-up" and EVERYONE agrees he's slipped significantly and some respectable voices are saying he is very very beatable now.

    Ruddock got caught by a near-flawless Lewis that night. And I dont see anything much in any of (alleged) "prime" Ruddock that would have made a difference. What do you think he would have done ?

    As for what happened after. You like to reference Ruddock-Morrison but there was actually twice as much time between his fights with Lewis and Morrison as there was between his second fight with Tyson and the Lewis fight !
    And in-between fighting Tyson and Lewis he stayed active, fought twice and stopped both fighters, whereas after fighting Lewis he disappeared, fought once in 2 1/2 years and was extended the full 10 rounds.
    It seems a little more likely that the aftermath of the Lewis fight tarnished his reputation and his actual capabilities/ambitions than the Tyson fights.
     
  12. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    He might have gotten back up and continued. I saw a focused and well prepared Ruddock get up from a Tyson lefthook that was equally as damaging as Lewis right hand.
    Ruddock maintained his top ranking after the Tyson fight because Tyson went to prison and was also being used by King. Both Phil Jackson and Greg Page were also Don King fighters. After losing to Lewis for the #1 spot, there was no reason for anyone to fight Ruddock and thats the reasoning behind the longer time off.
    Sure thats absolutely part of it, but not the start of it. The damage that Tyson did to Ruddock over two fights certainly cant be overlooked as a factor of Ruddocks decline, not only physically but mentally. Ruddock had reached the pinnacle of his career, fighting what was considered the top name in boxing, and failed twice.
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    The last knockdown in the Lewis-Ruddock fight was just sick. I was impressed with ruddock getting up the two times he did.
    Lewis was all over him, and it's a different proposition entirely from Tyson, who he could grab and smother or land on as he came in. Ruddock was up against a bigger, stronger, rangier man.
    I'm no big Lewis fan, but credit where it's due.

    Yes, the effects cannot be discounted, I agree.
    But the evidence isn't strong enough to say categorically. Also, I think the Ruddock of the Tyson fights didn't show much that would have made him perform any better against the Lewis he had the misfortune of meeting.
    The story was that Lewis turned out to be a lot more dangerous and destructive than anyone had realized.
     
  14. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Not really. When was the next time he had a comparable performance, five years later against Golota?
    He looked pretty shitty in his next few fights after Ruddock before getting stopped by Mcall.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    So, what's your point ?
    Fighters dont look at their most destructive every fight.