1997-2005, Calzaghe vs "The Ring" Top 10

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kmac, Dec 24, 2010.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    after calzaghe defeated the unranked chris eubank for the wbo belt in '97 he only fought 4 fighters who were ranked at the time by the ring magazine at 168 lbs. (these ratings are from the ring annual ratings)

    #6 Robin Reid in 1999
    #8 Richie Woodhall in 2000
    #5 Charles Brewer in 2002
    #5 Byron Mitchell in 2003

    it's beyond pathetic that calzaghe only fought four ranked fighters in a very weak weight class in an eight year span. also factor in that calzaghe only fought 9 opponents in his entire career that were ranked in the ring top 10 at the time joe fought them. (one of them was manfredo ranked at #10)

    again, i think joe was a very good fighter but his resume is embarrassing when you compare it to other good fighters in any era. frank warren is mostly to blame for this imo.

    merry xmas everybody!
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    His level of competition from 1997-2006 was absolutely pathetic, I think everyone agrees on that now. The vast majority of his career was utter ****.
     
  3. krishv123

    krishv123 Guest

    Il say this....Calzaghe never faced an elite fighter in his prime....but It would have taken an elite fighter in his prime to beat him...as his work rate would have been very hard to overcome if you were old past yr best.


    Also on the opponents listed in th thread.


    Robin Reid - Was coming of a one sided beat down from Sugar Boy Malinga

    Charles Brewer - was destroyed by Antwun Echols

    Byron Mithcel - was a primature stoppage- was also coming of a loss

    Richie Woodhall- was Kod by Keith Holmes in his previous match before facing Joe...


    So not only did he face only four ranked opposition he faced them on the downside....pathetic


    ....OH didnt he face Eubank when he was semi retired....last min replacement for Steve Collins....
     
  4. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    ooooh look what we have here - another hate calzaghe thread
     
  5. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    I guess we can make this kind of analysis with all fighters even some ATG would have embarassing resumes...
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    You forgot to write in bold. A troll without their trademark is just another troll.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    You think many ATGs only fought 4 top 10 opponents in 9-year title reigns? :huh
     
  8. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    - ring comic :lol: :lol:

    - its a shame calzaghe didn't fight robert allan 3 times :lol:

    - would you have prefered him to call every welterweight that moved out? :lol:

    - would you prefer it if calzaghe turned a career high pay day down to fight the legendary hakkar :rofl


    guess what


    This content is protected
     
  9. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    It'd have looked a hell of alot better had Hopkins not ducked him in 2002, I'll give you that.
     
  10. krishv123

    krishv123 Guest


    Wasnt that the same book that Joe admitted he would go to the US to fight ROy Jones????

    Robert Allen 3 times....no Joe faced MArio Veit twice LOL
     
  11. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    From a business point of view, it would have made sense. High risk fight, moving up in weight possibly giving up his middleweight championship, for $3m? He made $2.75m against Felix Trindad, and having won that, could be in the position to demand a lot more for super fights.

    He made $1.25m against Mourade Hakkar in a fight with very little risk, 2 fights later he made $1.125m fighting Robert Allen again. If he was making that much for defending his belt then it made sense to ask for more than $3m against Calzaghe.

    De La Hoya by the time these negotiations came round had already moved up to 154 and won a belt. Having continued to move through the weight classes, it wasn't seen as an unrealistic option I'm sure that Hopkins could potentially faced him in the future. He probably had an eye on that and didn't want to miss out on that $10,000,000-$15,000,000 payday.

    It's interesting to note also that Hopkins wasn't present at these negotiations and only had people there 'acting on his behalf'. May have been some sort of breakdown in communication beforehand on how much he actually wanted.
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    The sad thing is, fighting Robert Allen 3 times would actually do wonders for Calzaghe's resume. When Robin Reid is a top 5 win, you need all the help you can get.
     
  13. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    Ring Magizine would favour the American fighters.

    Sven Ottke vs Ring top 10

    1998: Charles Brewer (#5)
    1999: Thomas Tate (#6)
    2000: Charles Brewer (#4)
    2001: James Butler (#10)
    2001: Anthony Mundine (#9 in 02)
    2002: Thomas Tate (#6 in 01)
    2003: Byron Mitchell (#6)
    2003: Mads Larsen (#9, #7 in 02)
    2003: Robin Reid (#10)

    Bernard Hopkins vs Ring top 10

    1994: Segundo Mercudo (#7)
    1995: Segundo Mercudo (#7 in 94)
    1996: Joe Lipsey (#7 in 95)
    1997: John David Jackson (#9 in 96)
    1998: Robert Allen (#7)
    1999: Robert Allen (#7 in 98
    1999: Antwun Echols (#5)
    2000: Syd Vanderpool (#8
    2000: Antwun Echols (#5)
    2001: Keith Holmes (#6, #3 in 00)
    2001: Felix Trinidad (#1)
    2002: Carl Daniels (#8 in 01)
    2003: William Joppy (#4)
    2004: Robert Allen (#6, #2 in 03)
    2004: Oscar De la Hoya (#2)
    2005: Howard Eastman (#5, #1 in 04)
    2005: Jermain Taylor (#1)
    2005: Jermain Taylor (Ring Champ)

    Joe Calzaghe vs Ring top 10

    1999: Robin Reid (#9, #6 in 98
    2000: Richie Woodhall (#8 in 99)
    2002: Charles Brewer (#6, #5 in 01)
    2003: Byron Mitchell (#6., #5 in 03)
    2006: Jeff Lacy (#3)
    2006: Sakio Bika (#8 in 07)
    2007: Peter Manfredo (#10 in 06)
    2008: Mikkel Kessler (#1)
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    That´s why he was rated behind even Sven Ottke at the time ... says enough.
     
  15. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    all of this talk to bhop ducking joe in 2002 is crap. when you duck someone that means you don't fight them at all. bhop fought him at 43. i don't exactly think he feared joe.