1998 Prince Naseem Hamed vs 2001 Eric Morales @126..who wins?

Earl what happened to your account mate?

 

barrera said not to long ago hamed was the hardest puncher he had ever faced.

he also had a **** ton of natural ability (though clearly dident live up to his potential). far from a bum..

 

Morales was the same level as Barrera at the time. He would beat Hamed in the same fashion.

 

Barrera schooled him bad, made him look foolish then rammed his head into the turnbuckle and asked "who's your daddy"

 

How's the weather in England this time of year?

 

Hamed KO - Morales doesn't have a good enough defense or ring smarts to stay away from Hamed's bombs

 

Barrera was hardly touched by Hamed during their fight, for whats it worth Wayne McCullough said Morales punched harder than Hamed but Hamed was physically stronger than Morales its just opinions i never take them too seriously. i think its obvious to anyone who has seen both guys fight that Hamed was clearly the hardest puncher of the two, as for who i think would win the fight i think Morales leaky defense coupled with his tendency to go to war and trade punch for punch would be his downfall against Hamed who was one of the hardest hitting featherweight in history, I think Hamed gets off the floor and goes on to stop the careless Morales at around the sixth round in a great fight. I might be selling Morales who was a terrific fighter short here but thats the way i see the fight going.

 

Funny how Hamed fans cant cope with truth, he was entertaining he was talented he was good no doubt about it is he ATG level far from it, Floyd,Pac, Morales, Barrera, JMM are much much better fighters and beat the better fighters while Hamed run away from the sport after losing to ATG fighter, he had seen that its huge difference in fighting b+ level fighters and fighting legitimate ATG fighters.
Morales beats him, JMM beats him(possibly going down once) wide UD, Pac knockes him out, he just want on their level thats the fact...