you are off on some and missed a few . . . but who really cares . . . All you are doing is getting the klitlickers panties in a bunch and they will rush to Wlad defense. You cannot win an argument with a Klitlicker because SIZE is all that matters.
The funny part is that the thread starter put Wlad in with the very best all time great heavyweights, which proves Wlad is an ATG himself. You could say his intentions backfired on him. :yep
Absolut right, Wlad is one of the best of all the time and deep in his head the threadstarter knows it :hi:
What are you 5? I like how you pick all modern people. Moorer? Valuev? Golata? tua? are you serious? At least put people on their that are good like dempsey and jack johnson. grow up peter pan
fighters who could, nor would win or lose, beat wlad (prime, right now): Ali, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe (on his best day), Lewis, Vitali. thats all. so **** off with cruiserweight from the first 50 years of the 20 century imo just lewis is the guy who has the most tools to beat wlad and would imo probably win against him.
Then, how do you explain this? Wlad beat Rahman who beat Lewis Wlad beat Byrd who beat Holyfield who beat Foreman Wlad beat Byrd who beat Holyfield who beat Holmes who beat Norton who beat Ali