20 year old "CANELO" vs 20 year old "PACMAN" - WHO WINS??

Wow. It's incredible how stupid some people can be. Stop posting threads moron.

 

Its obvious one is much better at the age of 20.

That's why everyone is so high on Canelo. He is so good yet he is only 20. We have yet to see all his potential. He can go down as one of the best Mexicans of this era and he has big shoes to fill with the likes of Morales, Barrera and JMM.

 

Maybe, uhm.. die a violent death?

20 YO Canelo vs 20 YO Tyson next.

 

Are we talking P4P or are you matching a Jr Middleweight against Flyweight? If it's P4P, Pacquiao obliterates Canelo with ease.

 

at 20 years old? No way in hell thats back when he was getting KOd by lesser fighters than Canelo. Of course it would have to be p4p. Canelo just has too many tools compared to what Pac had at 20 years old.

 

stupid thread. canelo is a super welterweight and pac was a flyweight. but p4p pac by KO over the ginger mexican.

 

Actually at 19 years old Pacquiao was knocking out the lineal Flyweight champion while Canelo was struggling for one of the most disgraceful paper titles ever awarded against a journeyman from a different weight class.


Let's keep things in perspective here.

 

pac had already stopped the lineal champion sasakul at age 19 and a much greater champion than all alvarez had already beaten.

 

This content is protected

 

this goes to show how ignorant some of these fans thinking pac only started his career when he beat barrera thinking the same way floyd does that pac is just ordinary when he started. there's hardly ordinary with a 19 years old getting a lineal title over a highly-rated fighter in chatchai sasakul in his own hometown where robbery is prevalent.

 

are you a kid or just a plain ******?