2002 Tyson VS 1988 Holmes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Foreman Hook, Oct 16, 2010.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Tyson TKO 6 Old Foreman
     
  2. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    I love you Foreman Hook.
    I give Holmes a UD in this one.
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,490
    9,386
    Jul 17, 2009
    In 2002 I'd have said that Tyson was 14 years past his best,never mind 6. Holmes at this point,would have had much more left than Tyson. And he'd beat Tyson over the distance. Quite comfortably.
     
  4. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    58
    Dec 26, 2009
    Holmes via whitewash UD, Tyson was beyond shot & had no stamina.

    Holmes wasn't as rusty as people think, he had two 12 round exhibition fights during his 3 months of preparation time.
     
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,683
    13,494
    Jan 6, 2007
    :deal
     
  6. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    Tyson was at least 12 years past his real prime and Holmes wasn't really that far past it in 1988. True, Holmes had been inactive for 2 years but he was MUCH closer to his actual prime than Tyson was in 2002. '88 Holmes by UTTER HUMILIATION.
     
  7. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    :huh
     
  8. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    I'll just address the statement in a vacuum...If Morrison couldn't KO Big George(please watch the fight again to see what I mean) than how is '02 Tyson going to do it?
     
  9. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    At least you admiteed Tyson was Real-Prime VS Douglas 12 years before.:thumbsup

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8CDBgxXvUM[/ame]
     
  10. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010

    Prime Tyson cannt KO Cowgirl Tillis ,Tucker teh ****er , Old Smithy Or ***** Green - BUT he KO's Old Foreman??? :patsch:patsch
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Holmes probably.
    It's hard to say because he showed nothing much in those 4 rounds against Tyson.
    2002 Tyson would be a lot easier to hit and avoid though. He was at his sharpest in '88.

    Holmes was a dead man walking in '88, Tyson was a dead man walking in '02.
     
  12. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    505
    Jan 28, 2007
    Holmes's exhibitions were often less serious than sparring sessions, and even if they were hard exhibitions (which i highly doubt) the only real way to shake of rustiness is to have real fights. No amount of sparring will do as much good as a real fight.
     
  13. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    230
    Jun 2, 2007
    Teh Foreman Hook is such teh dumb****. He has no knowledge of teh the sport of Boxing.
     
  14. holmes by late tko or ud, even in the 90s holmes played with ray mercer, tyson was a joke in 2002, holmes any day.
     
  15. no version of tyson would beat george foreman, not 86 tyson,96 tyson or 3006 tyson.
    styles make fights and foreman would ko tyson ALWAYS. the tyson´s fan boys can talk what they want. tyson avoided old foreman, and cus damato knew that the style of mike or any short puncher was a suicide against george foreman. so george would kick his ass.
    oo... but tyson did beat the great berbick, the lhw spinks, old holmes and sugar peter mcneley