2004 Brewster vs 2015 Wlad

Brewster was never a top boxer, he was simply better than wlad.

btw sanders was a contender. just not when wladdi chose to fight him, then retired shot2shyt

 

wlad got destroyed, how come its brew wgo got pasted? u speaking from planet kliturd?

 

Is one from the USA by any chance?

 

the one who destroyed wlad, yes him.

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2005

Brewster rated at #4. He was rated top 5 for approximately 24 months during his WBO title spell. Brewster was rated at the same level as Marcus Beyer at SMW, Nelson at CW or Castillio at JW. You're calling Brewster a journeyman then call Beyer, Nelson and Castillio journeymen too you little clown :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Think about it...Wlad was/is a dominant fighter but Brewster beat him. Lemon wasn't quite as good in the rematch, so I clearly have to be a moronic troll and insist that Brewster is better than Wlad regardless of what the rematch shows OR the rest of their résumés.
This logic is flawless, for example;
McCall is forever better than Lewis because he clearly wasn't the same fighter in the rematch.
Rahman wasn't as hungry and fought sloppy in the rematch, therefor he is superior to Lennox in every way and even if Lennox had won 15 straight defenses after koing Rock that fact wouldn't change.
Tyson never rematches Buster so Mike is a gutless coward who can't beat a journey man.
Using my flawless hater moron logic, it is clear Max is better than Louis, Lamatta is better than Robinson....I'm such a total dip**** I could go on and on 😀

 

none of these are the same example at all.

Amen to that.