2005 version of Bernard Hopkins vs Glen Johnson?

hopkins would probably lose a razor sharp ud and complain about how he won that fight for months just like taylor, calzaghe

 

Another way to look at it would be that the 2005 Hopkins was a year younger than the version that dominated Antonio Tarver AFTER Tarver beat Johnson.

If we're assuming that the fight takes place at 175, I think Hopkins takes a decision win. That version of Hopkins might not allow Johnson to be that busy.

 

Hopkins by a close decision with no controversy.

 

Hopkins looked great against the younger Taylor and greater against Tarver damn good gainst Wright and good against Calzaghe he dropped Joe easily Johnson is the same Johnson that fought Bernard years past the difference is defense can Johnson be better in a rematch not Hopkins I see Bernard beating Johnson similar to the way he beat Wright probably more because Winky's hands or faster than Johnson.

 

Hopkins UD Johnson

 

Hopkins at any stage.

 

Johnson beats him down to a UD then of course Hopkins bitches about how he was robbed

 

you still here to overrated Joe's victory


people never change:bart

 

It's nothing to do with Joe. Hopkins was a class apart from Johnson when Johnson was very raw. I've seen nothing since then that would suggest anything different would happen

Hopkins has established himself as a great fighter, Johnson has been an improver and a great warrior that eventually reached world class level, but had wars with the sort of fighters Hopkins would outclass.

 

stop following me and stop those gay ass PM you are sending me with naked man in uniform

 

okay then

 

Glad you agree :think

Do you really see Johnson beating Hopkins?

He's not a good closer of distance. He's too slow and plodding with his footwork, Hopkins will counter him easily. Every time.

 

right now I see Johnson beating Hopkins via UD because of workrate and strenght