Hatton, in his prime, vs all of these (in 2007) just before Hatton lost to Mayweather. I think Hatton beats De La Hoya, Clottey and Judah. 50/50 against Cotto and Mosley. He gives Marquez a tough fight but gets counter punched all nights, loses to Margarito and Pacquiao. What do you guys reckon? (all at 147 except for Marquez and Pacquiao)
Hatton beats De La Hoya through sheer workrate Loses to Pac Beats Margarito through footwork Loses to Marquez Smashes through Judah Cotto is a difficult one. 50/50 Outworks Clottey Beats Mosley on points
Hatton vs De La Hoya would have been interesting. Hed beat the crap out of Clottey, out-tough/out dirty Judah and Judah would quit or get stopped. Cotto, depends. Is this at 147? if so, id favour Cotto. Margarito beats him due to size and pressure, but would have made an entertaining spectacle. Pacqiauo simply to sharp for Hatton. Mosely would seriosly hurt Hatton. Marquez, another interesting one, JMM can be hurt and Hatton could do some serious body work and infighting (not sure how Marquez reacts to bodypunches). It would be close and scrappy and Marquez probably visits the canvas. Hatton would probably JUST nick it.
Hatton wins none of those fights at 147 which is where Mayweather fought him, possible exception of Judah another '40lber. The likes of Margarito and Clottey are too big for Hatton. At 140, he's a match for anyone but Pac.
Hatton was awful against Lefties. At 147 he wasn't prime id pick Judah in that one. Cotto at 140 Hatton. At 147 probably Cotto. He could beat Clottey who bar being tuff doesn't bring a lot to a fight and isn't a puncher. Cant see him beating Oscar. He would get stopped by Shane. He would still loose to Pac
I wouldnt favour him in any of those except maybe Marquez, due to the natural size advantage where Marquez hadnt grown into it, even then I think I favour Marquez slightly