2008 Should Calzaghe have fought Pavlik instead of Jones.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by SuspiciousChees, Jun 5, 2013.


  1. SuspiciousChees

    SuspiciousChees Active Member Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Aug 7, 2010
    For his legacy. I remember reading somewhere ****** actually wanted to make the Pavlik fight instead of fighting Roy Jones.
     
  2. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    :deal iv always said this. He had no business fighting Roy Jones. It meant nothing.

    He should have exposed Pavlik at the MGM grand for the hype job he was, then he should have exposed Chad Dawson for the hype job that he was in those days too. Then he could have either fought Jermain Taylor or Carl Froch for his last fight, either he would have won. Then retire 48-0 greatness in no doubt :yep
     
  3. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Frank wanted him to fight Pavlik, then he left Frank and fought Roy for what I think was a bigger payday.

    Looking back now, scary to think just how highly regarded Pavlik was then.
     
  4. The Chosen

    The Chosen Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,128
    88
    Dec 14, 2008
    Pavlik and Dawson were the two everyone was calling for. Both would have done infinitely more for his legacy than fighting the shell of Roy Jones Jr.

    Worst retirement fight ever to say he "went out on top". Major kop out.
     
  5. Eoghan

    Eoghan Member Full Member

    148
    0
    May 6, 2013
    Yeah, but let's be honest here, bank balance is far more important than legacy
     
  6. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Definately he should have, but Hopkins did and got the glory instead.

    Calzaghe was extremely talented but his career is peppered with ifs and buts.
     
  7. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    He was a light heavyweight, and could have fought a middle weight or a guy who couldn't draw flies with 2 hands full of **** for his grand finale? People would be moaning about either now if he'd done that instead.
     
  8. phonk

    phonk Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Oct 19, 2007
    Calzaghe of 2008 would have ruined Pavlik the same way Hopkins did
     
  9. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    For his legacy and for the fans yes he should have, but if I were in his position I may well have done the same.
     
  10. boxfanlut

    boxfanlut Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,672
    7
    Apr 4, 2012
    Did pavlik even want the fight? What's the story?
     
  11. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Pavlik would have been more lucrative financially than Dawson, him vs Joe would have been an ideal Atlantic City type event.

    The Jones episode was a complete abortion, Roy was completely shot to ****, and worth absolutely nothing, but bagged an unbelievable 50% split by all accounts.

    Shocking business decision by JC, he held all the cards and could have offered Roy $1m and said 'here'.

    Both Hops and Pavlik got a $3m guarantee, not bad considering one of them was widely perceived to be an accident waiting to happen at 43.

    Pavlik would have taken the fight with Calzaghe, at that time he was flying high and would have fancied his chances. Considering Calzaghe ate right hands for breakfast it's easy to see why, looking back.

    Joe would have won and won well, but it wouldn't have been a complete demolition job.... more a 118-110 decision with a few competitive rounds.
     
  12. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,589
    6,623
    Oct 18, 2009
    Knowing what we know now, Calzaghe would have had an easy time with him.

    Still, people would have still found a way to ridicule the 'W' had he beat Pavlik.