2009 Pacquiao vs 1998 Tito

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, May 11, 2009.


  1. jlrivera81

    jlrivera81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,798
    1
    Jun 11, 2007
    wowwwwwwwww! people are going way too far with this pac love. Yes, he is a great fighter. But he is just too small for Tito.
     
  2. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    Let me tell you something. Don't ever think that I am beefing at any time. ;)I just want people to see different views. Pacquiao's handlers are doing a great job of his match making. Get that money while it's there. I like Manny a lot. He is a very good fighter without a doubt. For the record I didn't say black fighters are the slickest fighters out there. They just seem to bring a different element. I wish Pac-man and Mayweather the best in their careers. Both are HOFers no matter what happens when or if they ever meet. It's been nice competing with you.:bbbI feel where you are coming from and I hope you understand my points.:good
     
  3. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    lol dont worry about it. I just feel that the whole black thing is such an irrelevant argument. If your gonna argue something argue their style, not their colour. If your argument is that he never fought a slick fighter, we can confirm that to be untrue. On pure skin colour alone though, what difference does it make?

    I can see where your coming from but I 100% disagree with it :good
     
  4. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
  5. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    Oh don't get it twisted. It's not based on color at all. Carl Frouch, Joe Calzaghe, Kelly Pavlic, and plenty of others prove this true. It's just that a lot of black fighters have athletic attributes that cause problems for fighters that are used to fighting a certain type of opponent. That's all. At the end of the day... blue, yellow, white, brown, black, beige, tan, paisley....STYLES MAKE FIGHTS.:thumbsup
     
  6. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    after pac annihilated hatton, suddenly he became shot? :-(

    btw, tito by ko. he's too big for pac
     
  7. shinkijin

    shinkijin Freeloader Extraordinaire Full Member

    176
    0
    Apr 25, 2009
    I didn't even think anybody would have said this was ever a viable matchup....
     
  8. juanitoboxing

    juanitoboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,010
    1
    Jul 28, 2008
    Tito by KO, 1998 DLH also by KO
     
  9. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    Don't worry 1 space is already reserved for him.
     
  10. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Trinidad would catch upto Pac eventually but it wouldn't be as one sided as people suggest. Trinidad would be at a huge stylistic disadvantage with his fairly limited ring movement and footwork, Pac's footspeed and handspeed and use of angles would allow him to score on Trinidad pretty easily, though he would likely get caught at some point coming into range.

    His chin and size would be the difference.
     
  11. applez

    applez Member Full Member

    202
    0
    Nov 29, 2008
    depends what weight..140-147, I'll take pac..Tito would have no chance without his illegal wraps :yep
     
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Tito was slow as **** and had horrible footwork, if Pac could box he would have been able to beat Tito...But Pac is a jump in fighter much like Jones was in his prime...tito on the other hand was a timing fighter, and with that power he would turn Pac lights out with ONE shot.
     
  13. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    Pacquiao vs. George Foreman!!! All hail Pacquiao...
     
  14. Sarah

    Sarah Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,552
    0
    Feb 18, 2009
  15. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009


    This content is protected