2010-11 Pacquiao Vs Mayweather, would have been hell for Floyd!

When did marg turn into some power puncher ? Average ww punch and even worse at 150

 

I remember pacs limitations showing its huge head in exactly 2011 vs jmm. We've seen that but we never saw fmj struggle near that much until he was being abused by a huge and properly trained chino in I think 2013 ? 1st fight.

Difference is fmj found a way to beat the much bigger and dangerously strong chino, and that was after being down by 2 rounds or 2 points at the midway point.

I can't recall pac ever, not once in 70 odd fights, have to adjust and make a comeback during the 2nd half of any fight.

I never thought of this, buy has pac always been a front runner ??? Disney clown should be able to tell me every comeback pac came through in.

Not talking getting ktfo then coming back to prolong his career. I've just given myself enough time to conclude, pac has never came back to win a fight, out of 65 ish fights he loses if he's not able to dominate,

No comeback, which is the only meaningful comeback. Losing and rematching is losing all the same

 

Quit your agenda. Why did you avoid Cotto at welterweight?
Margarito fought a quarter of his fights at LMW, and the welterweights he fought were big. 39 wins, 27 KO's.
Pacquiao weighed in 6lbs less than Margarito. Pacquiao was meant to be knocked out brutally in his 140 days let alone LMW.
I'm not saying Marg was a huge puncher, but big enough to destroy Pac.

Think about this, a guy starts at 106lbs. He rises up in weight classes. Just 2 years of fighting and dominating an ATG in Barrera at 130, he dominates Cotto at welterweight despite being the much smaller man. This is a thing of legends.

 

You mean Floyd teamed PAC with his face, the only teamed I saw was Floyd face getting pounded.

 

I'm not understanding your agenda, I picked pac to beat cotto and beat him easy. That was a very unprepared cotto in every sense of the word. You shouldn't need the facts surrounding that fight pointed out. Pac is no where near as small as he is made out to be.

Marg and clottey were the only truly bigger fighters of pacs whole career. You do realize the age he turned pro, correct ?

The fact is him and fmj have always been the same exact size. Fmj has longer arms which makes him appear much bigger than pac and that's because he is allowed to fight like a 6 footer with rest of his body being normal for the 5'7" he is.

At every single age fmj and pac had always been the same size, do your homework. Fmj has less than a single " on pac, but fmj has little big man problems so everywhere outside the ring he wears lifts.

Fmj accepted the marg and cotto fights with TR, as long as he got 10M for Hatton and 20M for odh.
So that's the opposite of ducking in rationale people's minds.

More facts, fmj fought bigger guys his whole career while pac, out of 60+ fighters was truly the smaller fighter in only a handful of fights.

I know it sucks, I don't understand what the big deal is. Pac was coming in as a ww from way back in his 130 days. He was able to stay at a much lower weight class much longer. Fmj started at 130 at 19, pac started at really 15 at 106.

At 15/16 fmj was fighting at 105/108 on the amateurs. They always fought at the same fight night weights their entire careers. Some of you make up this "ducking" bs to troll fmj. Problems are, fmj never dropped/stripped or lost his title on the scales like your boy.

Pac was an atg also, so ya he was great. You trolls claim fmj ducked everyone which is just silly. He never fought marg, but if marg ever made it to a mandatory, you're damn sure he would've gotten the fight.

Hell, fmj gave him a shot, told him win a couple fights and we'll make it happen. Marg goes out and fugging losses, of course fmj made him lose

 

Floyd is the considerably naturally bigger guy than Pac. Only agenda would have you deny that.
Cotto said he was feeling good on fight night but lost to the better man.

 

Cotto also ****ed up paulie 1 year before at 135 and judah at 140

 

Floyd was roided up, but Pac won.

 

True. At the face/offs, if Pac looked straight ahead, his eye level would be at Floyd's chin. Floyd towered over Pac. Only idiotic Floyd fans claim they're the same size because Pac came in at 147 and Floyd at 146. The difference was stark on fight night. Plus Floyd was juiced.

 

Yeah Manny would have been younger and fresher but so would Floyd

 

Mayweather vs Pacquiao - The most hyped mismatch in boxing history. These idiots are still in denial, it's hilarious.

Pac couldn't even deal with Floyd's jab. Completely clueless on how to establish his range. Game, Set, Match. Put it to rest. Floyd was looking shot, and Pac still couldn't do anything. Let me repeat that: Floyd Mayweather "looked shot" in his fight against Pacquiao and Manny couldn't do **** regardless. As I said, Manny was neutralized by a jab and tamed.

Note to Idiots: In 2011 Pacquiao would still have the same problems. The man would not be able to establish his range on a consistent basis, which would lower his output just like you saw in their fight.

But then again, given how many idiot "the orthodox jab isn't useful against southpaws" threads I saw prior to the May/Pac fight, I can understand why you guys are still lost.

 

hell naw ... easy work