2010 Bernard Hopkins vs. Arthur Abraham

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dr. Larry, Sep 2, 2012.


  1. Dr. Larry

    Dr. Larry Guest

    How would this fight go?
     
    Dr. Larry, Sep 2, 2012
    Dr. Larry, Sep 2, 2012
    #1
  2. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Hopkins wins every second of every round. Hopkins now would've beat Abraham in his prime at 160.
     
    CASH_718, Sep 2, 2012
    CASH_718, Sep 2, 2012
    #2
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,957
    Jun 23, 2008
    A guy like AA is made in Heaven for Hop.
     
    Xplosive, Sep 2, 2012
    Xplosive, Sep 2, 2012
    #3
  4. Dr. Larry

    Dr. Larry Guest

    You forget about Abraham's power and Hopkins' age.
     
    Dr. Larry, Sep 2, 2012
    Dr. Larry, Sep 2, 2012
    #4
  5. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    And? Power means **** if you can't land and Hopkins chin is great.

    And Abraham's workrate is lower then Hopkins so age is no factor.
     
    CASH_718, Sep 2, 2012
    CASH_718, Sep 2, 2012
    #5
  6. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,957
    Jun 23, 2008
    AA's power is overrated and his workrate is comical.
     
    Xplosive, Sep 2, 2012
    Xplosive, Sep 2, 2012
    #6