2010 Ring P4P vs. 1989 Ring P4P

I can´t see Dawson beating Hill. Hill is faster of hand and foot and technically as good. You guys seem to remember only the old Hill. Hill is a clase above the likes of Tarver or Johnson. :bart

 

I saw Hill at the olympics at the LA sports arena in 84,and i followed him throughout his career, He had better legs and movement than Dawson but id give the edge in handspeed to Dawson(although close). Dawson also had the better punch. I think its a pretty even match, im just thinking Hill has a little more, he also hit harder. Dawson by close decision.

 

You made good points on Starling,Pac i could see Starling doing very well, but more times than not Pac outworks him.

At 118 Perez was a better fighter than Caballero, but im assuming this fight is at 122,126 since Cabellero was never a top fighter at 118. Perez seemed to not be the same fighter at the higher weighs thats why i said it was a tough one to call.

 

Like the Taylor fight without the late KO and with Chavez sustaining more damage himself

 

You feel like getting ***** slapped tonight PP?

 

no need to late KO

the Chavez KO would be in the mid rounds!

 

Whitaker-Marquez wouldnt even be competitive.... see Mayweather-Marquez for the blueprint.

 

Martinez and Williams over Michael Nunn? And Caballero? These guys are only top fighters in a poor era like we have now. Looking at these p4p lists, this era is sooo mediocre outside of Pac and Mayweather.