28day rule???

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by fortysixando, Nov 8, 2011.


  1. fortysixando

    fortysixando Active Member Full Member

    1,039
    0
    Sep 20, 2011
    i noticed something onn boxnation about the lad fighting bradley skeete moaning because of a 6 rounder instead of a 4 rounder then something about not fighting for 28days....anyone enlighten me on the ruling or whatever it is?
     
  2. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    as far as im aware if youre stopped you cant fight again for 28 days, he was moaning because apparently he thought he was only doing a four rounder, wasnt prepared for 6 and didnt he get stopped in the 5th? meaning he cant fight for 28 days, few paydays lost there
     
  3. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Can't even walk in a gym for 28 Days, Can't spar or doing anything. Fighters like Morris lose money and also time to prepare for bouts.
     
  4. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    personally i think it should be done case by case, i havent seen the fight, but he didnt take too much punishment did he? and he wasnt knocked out cold or anything
     
  5. noonan

    noonan Guest

    Amount of time between doin a girl up the shitter and her sucking it
     
  6. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Spot on but that would be to much effort for board...:-(
     
  7. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    i think the board needs a total shake up, i mean approving fights like burns-cook, and with recent robberies and dodgy stoppages where are they? did they say anything about cox-sai? its embarassing for the sport, the board of control should be focussing on stamping out **** like that
     
  8. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    incindentally, you dont happen to know mandanda do you?
     
  9. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    :-(
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtivSTZrezc[/ame]
     
  10. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    No, you cannot mess with safety, it is an excellent rule, and although it may cost a fighter a few pounds, better that than the potential consequences that sadly have happened time and again in this sport.


    Safety should come first, second and third in this sport.
     
  11. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Not that it excuses everything else Jim but the Cox fight wasn't really the Boards call. It was a Commonwealth matter.
     
  12. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
  13. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    true! trying to think of some more shockers off the top of my head where nothing is done, can only think of dallas-page, alright page is a journeyman, but its embarassing when verdicts like that are given, or the robbery on the undercard of the burns fight, forget their names bowen-carman or something? :huh
     
  14. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    And rightfully so, this is the 21st Century, not the 19th...
     
  15. unorthodox

    unorthodox Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Mar 20, 2009
    well said

    couldnt agree more :good