3 judges or Compubox- which do you prefer?

5 Judges - 4 On Each Side of the Ring

1 Watching on a TV with no commentators and the best angles.

 

Compubox only tells you the number of punches landed and not landed. The stats don't tell you the winner. It tells you nothing about who's landing the HARDER, MORE EFFECTIVE shots and who's truly winning the fight

I've seen numerous fights where fighters land more punches and still lose. I've seen fights where fighters land a better percentage of their punches than their opponent and still lose. Compubox means nothing.

 

That is a great idea, certainly better than 3 judges.

 

If you hit me with 5 light jabs, and I hit you with ONE monster haymaker right hand and got you doing the chicken dance. Who wins in your view?

Well compubox will tell you the 5 jabs won.

 

5th judge should be the ref

 

I think its better. More angles (usually two judges have it one way, while the 3rd is slightly off, because 2 jduges face each other, one judge faces a diff way.

 

What's up eze:good :smoke

 

NM man, resting after a long day of training(training for mma). Looking for rooms for rent, I have to soon move out of my friends house that I am living in because his moms boyfriend is an ******* and has short mans syndrome. (hes like 5'2) and doesn't want me in his house. So Ive gotta figure some things out.

 

Kick that mutha****a.

 

:good Great that you are training bro stay up:good

Good luck man:good