Each pick sounds good, but most likely at least one of them ruins it for you. Kondo has never been stopped and even if he takes a beating may have a chin too solid for Lipinets to dent; Porter is no Broner and could well overhwhelm and stop Granados; and Quigg by KO isn't too sure either. Definitely decent long value there, good luck, but you'll probably end up wishing you played them singles!
Btw, Bivol-Broadhurst under 5.5 rounds was my only play for the weekend... but I just added a Breazeale/Quigg/Wilder/Porter/Lipinets
i have actually won my last two bets with a 3rd at 8/1 should come in (quig to win) so looks safe bet so altogether of the ones a won plus that one almost in is about £270 and i just took £20 off that winnings for this bet to win £100 so my accumulated bets are coming in recently =)
i thought it would be more than that considering some of them are unlikely i thought 66/1 would be more fair try using accumulator odds checker to get the best odds
And... that's why I say multi-match parlays are for suckers. The remaining plays could easily come through, but a head butt ruins the bet. Though I've stupidly decided to try horse racing betting today and sure can't talk.
Haha 100% I decided against it in the end. Thankfully... wouldn’t of been my best bet so glad I didn’t pull the trigger on it
Good. Betting of course is never safe, that's why the house usually wins. There are some instances in boxing when there are good odds in boxing, when bookies seem to lack information about bad style matchups, glaring weaknesses and strenghts or overrate the local or featured fighter. Clear examples are the KO1 or under 5.5 rounds in Arreola vs Mitchell that almost everyone predicted from the start, Kovalev vs Cleverly (KO or outright win) and recently the over 9.5 on Porter vs tough as nails Granados. But they sadly don't come around too often.