>>> 40 y/o Wlad vs 40 y/o Big George...

27 year old Moorer actually dodged , slipped and parried shots. Wlad does not.
There's no such thing as a lucky shot in boxing. He threw the blow with the intent of it knowing out his opponent. I fyou acutally knew anything about that fight you would know Foreman was boxing to a plan and winning rounds was not part of the plan. He deliberately pulled his punched and lured Moorer into a false sense of security.He was setting up the perfect moment and he found it he struck - KO.

 

Peter dropped him a number of times. If Sam Peter can land and drop him , Foreman would surely knock him out cold. Foreman had a brutal body attack on top of it. Brewsters hooks to the body really blew the steam out of Wlad in that fight where he was stopped .

 

Wlad on points. Possibly stoppage


He would Be too fast with his combos and would move and use the ring to where foreman would get frustrated and swollen as he did in the Holyfield fight

 

We are talking about the 40 year old Wlad who has experience being in tough positions before. It could very well go like that but I believe it would be unlikely.

 

You look at the names 40 y/o George was stopping and it's all fringe men. There is nobody of the calibre of Jennings, Pulev or Fury: unbeaten top contenders. Wlad by clear UD.

 

Wladimir probably either stops him late or wins a wide UD. Too intelligent and too cautious for slow and sluggish Foreman.

 

You calling Foreman slow in comparison to Lumbering Vlad? LMAOL!

 

Yes. He, at 40, was way slower than Wladimir. And not to mention that Wlad is a superior technician, better on the outside and very cautious.

 

End thread I didn't even read the rest of it

 

Ouch what an idiotic statement in support of an argument for a robot like Vlad

 

They actually think a one dimensional robot like Vlad could beat Foreman.

 

foreman in 4 ...

 

You probably believe this, which is sad.

Look at Wlads competition vs George's