42-year old George Foreman vs. Ike Ibeabuchi

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, Jun 23, 2009.


  1. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    27
    Jun 2, 2009
    Who wins it?
     
  2. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Ibeabuchi was the guy I was hoping was going to be next great. He was like a bigger version of Evander Holyfield. Too bad he was nuts. I think he would do a number on Foreman.
     
  3. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,174
    25,423
    Jan 3, 2007
    Although my heart wants Goerge Foreman ( and he may very well have taken it ), Ike Ibeabuchi would have been a very dangerous opponent for him at any point during his comeback. He was likely the type of opponent that George would have steered clear from ( and perhaps did. ) Ibeabuchi's chin, power and skills were all tested a very a reasonable level, despite not having very many fights. Beating prime versions of David Tua and Chris Byrd with under 20 bouts would have been considered a noble feat for almost anyone.

    I'm thinking Ike takes a decision and if he gets Goerge bleeding early the way that Alex Stewart did, may very well have forced a stoppage.
     
  5. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Ike by easy UD.
     
  6. Chris Warren

    Chris Warren Active Member Full Member

    964
    10
    Apr 22, 2009
    Hasim Rahman also beat Tua so what does that prove? Chris Byrd is a middleweight so again what does that prove? Tua is a shorter man with power only in his left hook. Foreman had power in every punch.
     
  7. rm36

    rm36 Active Member Full Member

    1,311
    8
    Jun 26, 2009
    Ike would get a pretty easy unanimous decision. George would have likely swelled up pretty terribly after such a fight. I think Ike may now be just slightly overrated (there were times when he did not look all that impressive that aren't usually mentioned). But I still think the fighter who gave David Tua all that he could handle would have been too active for George to best. George still had power, however, and Ike although he was very durable could be hurt. That was part of why he chose to rely so heavily on the jab later on in the Ibeabuchi fight when everyone was saying he needed more behind it. The fight will progress differently as it will be more of a boxing match than the phone booth Tua fight. That's going to encourage Ike to use the jab, and the occasional Foreman shot will keep Ike honest. But, through out it, he'll just be too busy for Foreman.
     
  8. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    Ike never proved anything, Foreman wins anyday. The thing Tua didnt have was a jab, he just lay on his chest and let him hit him. George is an intelligent boxer.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,651
    83,471
    Nov 30, 2006
    So we're talking about the George that fought Holyfield against the Ike that fought Tua? :think

    Ike's activity would seem hard to argue with..
     
  10. Cachibatches

    Cachibatches Boxing Junkie banned

    10,261
    12
    Nov 12, 2006
    Ike never beat anybody of Foreman's size. I don't know that he could get throught that piston of a jab.