...

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by tmsbry, Jul 27, 2012.


  1. Jolly Roger

    Jolly Roger Active Member Full Member

    1,162
    1,205
    Nov 5, 2007
    Why are we bothering to watch this ****?
     
  2. ShaneTheSherrif

    ShaneTheSherrif Active Member Full Member

    803
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Close and I had Mongolian winning 1st round but Stalker doing enough in the other two to win it. Surprised at the decision!
     
  3. Doyley10

    Doyley10 Active Member Full Member

    549
    0
    Jul 2, 2007
    Not a massive rip off but I thought Stalker won with a little bit to spare. The home fighter getting a slightly raw deal adds credence to the theory that it's the scoring system thats flawed and the judging crap rather than anything being hookey.
     
  4. JFT96

    JFT96 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    1
    Apr 27, 2010
    Tough fight that. I had Mongolian comfortably up after 1, Stalker getting it back in the 2nd but still just behind but then winning the third to take it. Shame for Tom
     
  5. leo_messi

    leo_messi Guest

    it wasnt an out and out robbery, but i thought stalker by about 2 personally. And i was watching online with no commentary. I think he edged the 2nd and edged the third. First was close, mongol probably nicked a point more.
     
  6. moorser

    moorser Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,807
    193
    Jan 8, 2009
    Do you lads watch 2 boxers or just the home fighter ? Honestly how many times did Stalker have his head snapped back , it was close fight couldnt argue either way !

    I was watching on the RTE stream with no commentary I think some of you are swayed by Woodhall too much !
     
  7. Woodhall sounds flat now lol
     
  8. Abertawe

    Abertawe Guest

    Stalker got caught with silly shots but the last round was a joke. There was no way he didn't **** the 3rd, therefor he should have won.
     
  9. FIN

    FIN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,865
    1
    Mar 13, 2010
    Right verdict,Stalker lost,Richie Woodhall and Jim Neilly were so biased it was sick,hard luck Stalker put up a great effort..
     
  10. Flexe

    Flexe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,904
    3
    Apr 17, 2011
    Yeah the work of the Mongolian wasn't getting credit. Without being bias I thought the Mongolian won the third round. Very close fight. Not much wrong with the decision.
     
  11. joegrundy

    joegrundy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    The Mongolian wasn't landing clean punches lad, throwing loads but hardly landing any clean shots, specially in the third.

    **** knows where Toms going to go from here, I wouldn't stay amateur if I was him, something similar could easily happen in brazil.
     
  12. Flexe

    Flexe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,904
    3
    Apr 17, 2011
    Yeah I tend not to listen to them. And this goes for most commentary in boxing in general. Never acknowledge the away fighters work. Just pretend like they don't even exist and give barely no credit.
     
  13. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    I thought stalker won that fight.

    I had him losing the first by 1, winning the second by 1 and bossing the third. Easily won that by 2/3 points. Don't know wtf the judges were seeing
     
  14. joe33

    joe33 Guest

    You guys are mental, stalker lost that by about 2, lost the 2nd and last round and maybe a draw for the first, the commentry was ****ing awful, get the blinkers off.
     
  15. hth

    hth one horrible b*stard!!!!! Full Member

    0
    0
    Jul 20, 2012
    pfffft **** me ive heard of home town decisions before but that was the absolute reverse

    gonna spend the next 24 hours defending this great sport of ours to my mates

    cheers judges :patsch:twisted::nono