43-0 with 31 kos and you still need a tuneup?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bigtime9, Jul 1, 2007.


  1. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    And yet you still haven't caught on... :huh
     
  2. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    I'm not saying that. No-one is saying that. So we can dismiss this post of yours as a complete waste of time.

    What I'm saying is that, given his ribs couldn't stand up under Hatton's battery for four rounds, there would be no way Castillo- prime or not- could survive against Hatton. Hatton proved he would KO any version of Castillo, and probably in the first half of the fight.
     
  3. Guru_Too_You

    Guru_Too_You ESB OG circa '99 Full Member

    3,217
    0
    Jul 24, 2004
    I call bull ****.

    Prime Castillo was an excellent boxer from a distance as well as a workhorse on the inside. He has no legs anymore, so he was essentially forced to fight on the inside against a bigger man. In his prime, Castillo would have had the option of boxing Ricky from a distance, something the current state of his legs just doesnt allow.

    Not saying Castillo beats him easily or every time, but it certainly would not have ended like it did most of the times.
     
  4. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Listen twat, your flopping around like a stinky fish out of water and I never made any NEGATIVE remarks about Gatti:nono . Simply THAT HE WAS NOT THE CHAMPION at 40. He was a titlelist but the CHAMP was Tszyu and only a special brand of MORON like you and ***time would suggest otherwise. So, genius, FLoyd wasnt really a 5 division Champ. In fact, he was unified only once and held two LINEAL belts. :good

    As for telling me NOT TO RESPOND:lol: :lol: :lol: :finger I'll call BS anytime I feel like it:yep :yep :yep
     
  5. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    sorry mr.pickles but floyd won 5 WBC titles in 5 weight classes...first fighter in histore to do so. Gatti was the wbc champ and ranked #1 by ring magazine. Oscar was WBC champ at 154 (I have to keep repeating myself to this douche bag) and ranked #3 by Ring magazine are you saying gatti and oscar were not the best fighters in their divisions.:rofl

    and for your info floyd did not unify 130, he was the lineal champ at 130, 135, and 147. get your facts straight **** face
     
  6. Fab2333

    Fab2333 Needs to Get It 2Gether Full Member

    5,359
    2
    Oct 25, 2006
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
    awwe man the insults are priceless
     
  7. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    He had legs. The difference was that Hatton has better footwork than any of his previous opponents. At any rate, I can't see ANY smaller man out-box Hatton. Collazo couldn't do it despite being bigger, stronger and facing an oversized Hatton.
     
  8. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    What a friggin IDIOT!!!! Keep up the stupidity MORON:lol:

    First, Gatti wasnt the real champ at 40, remember the Brian kenney interview with Floyd where he had PBF pissing himself?? That's you right now, CLOWN:lol: Kostya tszyu had unified the belts and became the LINEAL CHAMP, funny how you assert the importance vs Hernandez and Baldo and DISMISS it at 40. One dumb mutha%$%$%$%!! No Gatti wasnt the best

    Second, winning Alpha titles doesnt mean you are the champ of the divison, ass-hole, it means you are a belt-holder unless you beat the lineal Champ a la Baldo. The BC isnt held in any higher regard than the other orgs, as they have all been corrupted and full of ****.

    Third?? Floyd lineal at 35???:lol: :lol: :lol:

    Here ya go ****face from 1970 until NOW:

    This content is protected
    (1970)
    This content is protected
    (1970-1972)
    This content is protected
    [1972-1979, vacates title]
    This content is protected
    (1981-1982)
    This content is protected
    (1987-1989, vacates title)
    This content is protected
    (vacates title 1992)

    There hasnt been a LINEAL champ at 35 SINCE WHITAKER!!:lol: :hi:


    Now, the only point you have to make, Floyd wasnt technically unified at 30!! Way to discredit the highest accomplishement Floyd's achieved at ANY weight:lol: I gave him credit as being unified at 30 after Corrales MY MISTAKE:good

    So Floyd has been Lineal TWICE, never UNified, and a 5 time alphabet titlelist. As for 54?? It's lineally vacant as well last vacated by WRIGHT and Floyd hasnt made a defense at either 47 or 54 so far. You mention history?? The orgs werent around before the 70's so there was only 1 belt to be had, which prevents the 5 time poop and scoop you refer too.

    Keep coming ***TIME and I'll keep smacking ya around:lol: :lol:
     
  9. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Read the above and share some of that humble pie with you're new boyfriend:lol:

    :hi:
     
  10. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    Zu relinquished the BA and BC tittles you ass backwards clown which means ........ he is only a tittlest as you so eliquently want to put it..he had the IBF belt left. HE WAS NOT THE CHAMP.

    The statement highlighted in bold really shows your stupidity and ignorance for boxing period. Kill yourself!
     
  11. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    how many 5 time alpahbet titlists are undefeated..don't worry I'll wait:admin

    and by the way how many fighters have gone from 130 to 154 winning the wbc title along the way while remaining undefeated:huh :deal
     
  12. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    \


    most posters on esb know this, your just to stupid for your own good. did floyd take your lunch money.

    I wonder what your excuse will be when floyd rips hatton a new one. If hatton is defeated that will be four ring titles in four weight classes...priceless:admin
     
  13. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007

    Actually tszyu was stripped of at least one of those belts when he didnt face a mandatory due to injury.

    Now, you talk stupidity??:lol: :lol: :lol: Once Unified he became the LINEAL CHAMP and therefore the man to beat you dumb little *****!! That doesnt change because he got stripped or relinquished either or both belts, IT ONLY CHANGES WITH A LOSS or RETIREMENT:good

    Gatti was not the CHAMP, he was a titlelist PLAIN and SIMPLE. The ****ing lunacy you and you're new butt buddy are displaying is QUITE ENTERTAINING as you show your asses to all:lol:

    Welcome to boxing:happy as you OBVIOUSLY dont know you're ass from a hole in the ground.
     
  14. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007

    ***TIME, listen closely and GRASP how many fighter's in history had the CHANCE to win these alphabet titles. Prior to the seventies YOU HAD ONE BELT, you dense little TROLL!!! So, these "belts" you celebrate as championships can only be compared with fighters since that point and ARE NOT AS MEANINGFUL as the pre 70's Champs:good Hence the development of LINEAL and UNIFICATION which are designed to track the real CHAMPS and re-establish NEW ONES!!!!!!! Not to mention not every fighter had the desire to play the jump weight, wekest link game as you're HERO!!

    Again with the BC?? WHO GIVES A ****!!! It;s no more meaningful than either the BA, BF, and hell these day's EVEN THE BO:lol:

    Undefeated?? Gee, that's a HELL OF A LOT EASIER WHEN YOU DONT FIGHT THE BEST OPPOSITION!! As you pointed OUT IN EVERY WEIGHT CLASS from 30 ro 54:lol: :lol: Jumping from weight to weight picking on the WEAKEST LINKS doesnt equate in ANY WAY to true greatness. I've said all a long that IF Floyd would fight the best and stay undefeated then I would give him the proper respect, BUT IT HAS TO HAPPEN TO BE REAL.


    Keep coming my little *****!!!:bbb
     
  15. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Most posters on ESB know that you are a ****ing idiotic TROLL as well:lol:

    I dont make excuses, perhaps Floyd could prove to be the GREAT he believes he is, BUT HE HASNT FOUGHT THE OPPOSITION TO SOLIDIFY THOSE CLAIMS TO THIS POINT:good

    Ring?? Now you wanna cling to Ring:lol: Newsflash, even Ring has had ****ed up ratings and BS as well from time to time. I generally find them better than Alpha rankings but THEY ARENT THE BE ALL either.The only thing that really matter's? IS FIGHTING AND BEATING THE BEST!! Then you dont need Alpha or Ring rankings to justify anything, YOU GET PROOF:good

    If Floyd does it?? Good for him, but you dont get credit UNTIL IT HAPPENS.