48-0 Ring Legend Chris John gunning for 49th and 0 record on April 14

JMM gets a lot of credit for wins which he didn't really win. The record shows John and Pacman beat him 1 and 2 times, yet I hear people say JMM didn't lose to them. Why even have decisions or judges if we are going to deny a fighter a victory.

 

It's a subjective sport mag and in close fights that could go either way I say we bow down to judges decisions.

I dont personally see pac1 and pac3 being scored for pacman same way I don't see John being scored for John.

I have seen the Pac - Jmm quadrilogy so many times I've lost count. The first fight I have always scored for Juan. The second I score differently each time so I let the judges decide. The third I scored a draw once and every other time a Juan victory. I might rewatch John and Pac3 some time because they are close and if I can see where the judge comes from I'll respect their decision..otherwise I call it how I see it.

 

I'll need to rewatch it but I think I did factor in the point deductions

 

Just watched pac-jmm 1 again. Had it 7-5 jmm. There are more close rounds than I previously gave credit namely 2, 8, 9. I'm more flexible in my scoring now than I used to be and I guess all it takes is scoring round 2 even to give 7-4-1 and hence a draw. I do think f the judges decision is reasonable it should be bowed down to.

I.can't for the life of me.see 7 or 8 rounds to Pac in the rubber so i guess that means i have it 2-1-1 for jmm. It's a great series and i could watch it all again tomorrow. One of the very best in history.

As for John - Jmm, wouldn't play on my phone so guess I'll have to watch that later on.

 

$$$ :yep C'mon this is boxing son you'll always have some shady **** going on. Kellerman said Marquez might of been the best out of the Magnificent 4 (Morales,MAB, Pacquiao, and Jmm), that's arguable, but he may have been right. Most folks think Floyd is the only legit loss in Juan's record. I could give a **** if Jmm was Mexican or not, but I'm glad he is. Dude fights anyone. No one cares about what the record says they care about the fight itself. Those are true fans only *******s and *****s care about records.

 

What did Marquez or anyone on his team say about the John decision? Why no rematch?

 

:deal John > Ricardo Lopez

 

Wrong, 49-0 > 48-0-2. YDKSAB.

Reason why? A draw means a judge had you losing. Marciano never had any draws. So to say he "surpassed" Marciano because he has 2 draws means you are a ****ing ****.

 

How impressed were you with Rigo in terms of his in ring performance and in a historical sense considering his pro inexperience, the quality of fighter he just beat (Top 5 P4P by everyone) and the manner in which he won?

 

I can't see any reason for John not to get this one, unless Hosono knocks him out.