5 worst heavyweight champions

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Feb 29, 2020.


  1. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    completely agree with everything said here
     
  2. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,011
    863
    Jul 30, 2010
    If you think that any of these champions was better than Tubbs in my opinion you are wrong.
    Stiverne
    Botha
    Bentt
    Seldon
    Martín
    Briggs
    Liakhovich
    Leon Spinks
    Maskaev
    Peter
    And the list could continue
     
    mcvey likes this.
  3. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,316
    11,710
    Mar 19, 2012
    Ali probably threw that fight. Not Spinks fault though
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I think they are a similar level. Nothing on Tubbs record outshines their worth.

    leon spinks has the single best win on that list. So he probably doesn’t deserve to be on it. You can’t take it from Leon. For one night the world had to accept he beat the best guy out there. Tubbs and the rest of them never did. Not for one night. Not ever.
     
  5. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,011
    863
    Jul 30, 2010
    I think that Tubbs in his prime beat everyone I name without problem
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Back? Where have I been?
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    David Tua only ever beat one man ranked in the top ten (Hasim Rahman), and that fight should arguably have been DQ.
    Were there better opponents that he could have fought?

    If not then the win's still have to count for something.
    I can assure you, that if somebody legitimately beats the best heavyweight contender, I would give them credit if they were a bantamweight.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    Hart beat Johnson, whatever the circumstances, so he deserved to be in the fight for the vacant title.

    Root had beaten Hart previously, so he was at least credible I guess.

    While the Hart lineage is not perfect, I tend to roll with it, as being the least bad option.
     
    choklab likes this.
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    Once you start including alphabet champions, that probably buys every lineal off the list.

    Just by winning the lineal title, you would have done much more than the worst alphabet champions.
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I don’t think Tubbs was reliable enough to string two good wins together. He only fought hard enough to keep a fight close. He just messed guys about. He’s not consistent enough to beat Botha, Stiverne, Charles Martin, Leon Spinks, maskaev, Peter And Bentt in a row. He’d likely beat Stiverne then get knocked flat by Bentt in his next fight. And I don’t think he could ever beat Leon Spinks the night Leon beat Ali. As poor as Ali was when Leon fought him that is still about as good as Prime Tubbs ever was. The guy simply doesn’t deserve much credit. Sure he had talent. He just didn’t have the wins. He was never a the best heavyweight in the world. Never could have been.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2020
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not questioning his claim, I'm questioning your claim that he beat the best to do so.
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,625
    17,701
    Apr 3, 2012
    A little off topic. Shannon Briggs has to be the worst two times champion.
     
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  13. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    There's really not a case for Jeffries being anywhere near this list even if you don't rate his era.

    At the least you'd have to put him above Corbett and Fitzsimmons. And you'd have to put him over Hart and Burns too.

    And the criticisms of his era apply even more to Sullivan's, so not rating Jeffries you'd have to put him above Sullivan.
     
    janitor likes this.
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    If his win over Johnson carries any legitimacy, then that puts him in a very strong position.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    If you put Jeffries on the list, then that is pretty bad for every champion before Louis.

    Jeffries clearly has the best title reign of any champion between Sullivan and Louis, so that would make the pre Louis champions look pretty bad, even if you had then above Jeffries overall.
     
    choklab and BitPlayerVesti like this.