50/50 no options not good enough

Please provide a SOURCE that proves Klitschko offered Haye a 50/50 with no options deal...

 

I think both K2 brothers have stated they offered him a 50/50 with no options.

 

Not according to Haye when he put his points forward on the Ringside boxing show, saying how he shook Vitalis hand on what was agreed, but when the contract came through how Haye (if he won) would have to give not one rematch but two! Haye said there was all kinds of things different to what was agreed which they couldnt get changed back to what was agreed.
Id be interested to hear what the Klitschkos reply to what Haye said on The Ringside boxing show recently

 

I said both K2 brothers stated it I never said I believed them.

 

:good

I don't believe **** all that comes out of K2. They're a pack of ****s who try and bully fighters into signing away their lives. They're ****ing cowards who will do anything to avoid risk. Even if it kills the sport they supposedly love and represent. **** them.

 

Is the correct answer.

The term ducking doesn't apply if the fighter has full intentions of fighting a guy when he chooses.

Haye's probably going to make close to the same amount fighting Harrison than he would vs Wlad. He won't fight a guy who he knows is more than likely going to beat him when he can fight a guy with far less risk and make just as much, he's saving that for his last fight.

I don't like it but there you go.

 

You're another ****ing moron. Wlad has no PPV deal ANYWHERE in the world. The numbers are in and he generates around 6mn Euro per fight TOTAL. The Haye Valuev fight did well over £10mn in UK PPV alone.

Stop ****ing throwing out random bull**** statements and claims that are totally ****ing bogus.

If your sources are so abundant then post one you stupid ****. The Klits CLAIM to have given a 50-50 deal to Haye, but they said the same thing in the Vitali-Haye negotiations and when Haye got the contract it was full of extra rematch clauses and options that were never agreed on.

K2 are a bunch of lying ****s and I don't care about the hearsay. Point is, it's a unification bout and Haye brings in **** loads more cash so 50-50 is ****ing bogus.

 

BULL****! No facts. Just worthless opinions.

Haye is self promoted but has to send some UNKNOWN amount of money to Saurland. It could be **** all for all you know.

Wlad has no PPV deal cos he is the consensus most boring HW champ in history. He has been banned from HBO and he can't sell a single PPV in the UK. RTL APPARENTLY give him around 3mn million EURO per fight of which he does not keep all the money.

The Live Gate at ANY fight is a small chunk of the total revenue and it comes with plenty of associated costs. Only Klit fans throw out the gate as something to be proud of and Wlad sells tickets at ridiculously low prices.

Haye holds the WBA belt, Wlad hold the WBO and IBF. It is a unification bout.

Khan-Mayweather is a ******ed analogy as Mayweather is one of the 2 most marketable fighters on the planet. Wladimir is without question one of the very least marketable long-time HW champs in history.

Haye brings much more money to the table than Wlad. Wlad has no leverage to demand a 50-50 split. Facts.

 

50/50 and a chance to dethrown him is fair enough if not too good a deal.

 

I said to embrace the Toaster Love not let it consume you...

:scaredas:

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected