50 greatest boxers of all time!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009.


Page 1 of 4
  1. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Yes, another one........................As compiled by the writers at YesPeeEN:

    MAY/2007


    50. Mike Tyson
    49. Erik Morales
    48. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
    47. Bernard Hopkins
    46. Roy Jones Jr.
    45. Carlos Monzon
    44. Pernell Whitaker
    43. Marco Antonio Barrera
    42. Alexis Arguello
    41. Ted "Kid" Lewis

    40. Evander Holyfield
    39. Oscar De La Hoya
    38. Larry Holmes
    37. Thomas Hearns
    36. Eder Jofre
    35. Marvin Hagler
    34. Emile Griffith
    33. Ruben Olivares
    32. Jose Napoles
    31. Billy Conn

    30. Terry McGovern
    29. Sandy Saddler
    28. Jake LaMotta
    27. Ezzard Charles
    26. Joe Frazier
    25. Marcel Cerdan
    24. Julio Cesar Chavez
    23. Jimmy McLarnin
    22. Barney Ross
    21. Tony Canzoneri


    20. George Foreman
    19. Stanley Ketchel
    18. Archie Moore
    17. Mickey Walker
    16. Gene Tunney
    15. Jimmy Wilde
    14. Rocky Marciano
    13. Harry Greb
    12. Sugar Ray Leonard
    11. Joe Gans

    10. Sam Langford
    9. Jack Dempsey
    8. Jack Johnson
    7. Benny Leonard
    6. Roberto Duran
    5. Willie Pep
    4. Joe Louis
    3. Henry Armstrong
    2. Muhammad Ali
    1. Sugar Ray Robinson

    Comments:think
     
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    #1
  2. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Louis is too high, should certainly be below Pep, Langford and perhaps Duran is a little too high too. Armstrong and Ali should be switched and perhaps Ali should be demoted to the lower top 10. Chavez is too high, Whitaker is too low and there should be a place in the top 40 for Pacquiao. Also Dempsey is far, far too high - there's no justification for him being above Gene Tunney.
     
    ApatheticLeader, May 11, 2009
    ApatheticLeader, May 11, 2009
    #2
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    ****ing terible.

    This is one of the worst lists ever, basically.
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #3
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    OK, what changes would make it more to your liking:think
     
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    #4
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007

    There are basically to many to mention.

    Langford at #10 is horrible. He is my #1 and a lock for the top 4.

    Tyson at #50? What the **** is that? Tyson didn't make my 100, and never would.

    Monzon at #45?! That is crazy insane type of ****.

    Greb at #13, Dempsey at #9, what the ****, Dempsey doesn't even make my top 10 at HW! Let's hear any justifable argument for having Dempsey above Tunney, pound for pound?!

    I remember this list and they list "popularity" or "affect on wider culture" or some such **** amongst their criteria, which is basically a liscence to **** up as far as i can see.
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #5
  6. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    for one, sweet pea's ranked at 44th?:think
     
    Totomabs, May 11, 2009
    Totomabs, May 11, 2009
    #6
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    :twisted:
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #7
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ezzard Charles is at 27. Can't imagine any sane argument for his being out of the ten, frankly.
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #8
  9. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Yes, thats the very same list.

    I find it interesting that you disagreed mainly with the placement of the "old timers":think
     
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    #9
  10. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,637
    43
    Mar 6, 2006
    No Manny Pacquiao.
     
    Chiko_Tech, May 11, 2009
    Chiko_Tech, May 11, 2009
    #10
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    Old timers like Tyson and Monzon?
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #11
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    Old list.
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #12
  13. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    That's why old timers was in quotes. Tyson and MOnson are old timers compared to the newer entrants ie. Morales, PBF, DLH etc.
     
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    Gonzarelli, May 11, 2009
    #13
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    And are you making a point or just an observation?
     
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    McGrain, May 11, 2009
    #14
  15. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    only one fighter in their top 35 comes from the last 20 years
     
    asero, May 11, 2009
    asero, May 11, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 4