7 days blood cutoff w/ unlimited urine and immediate blood test after fight!

One sided bull just like May.

 

so again i ask you ( we are just circling around) was 7 cut-off days not fair for this instance where we want to have a clean PED free fight?

 

Not at all, can you answer them with a straight face or not.

You know it all adds up.

You are eating out of bob arums hand and he is feeding you chicken ****, and you are willingly lapping that **** up with no retaliation.

 

Wait i answer your question, i ask you one and you want to ask me another one that i have alreasy answered?

:huh

Why is it ok to not take a drug test?.

Answer it.

 

Nice speech. But Floyd didn't ask for this kind of testing for Zab, Baldimir, Hatton, Oscar etc.. What makes Pac different? Simple. He's just not confident in himself that he can beat Pac.

 

Yeah and you are gorging on all the "facts" Roger, Floyd Jr and Floyd Sr says. You must also believe that Filipino soldiers use a-side meth, that bullets can't hurt them and that they were at war against the Americans several hundreds of years ago. :roll:

You must also believe that no 2nd negotiations ever took place despite of HBO saying that there indeed were.

 

yes i know you answered it with some evolved drug stuff but you did not answered my follow-up question that why is it 14 days was fair before and not the 7 days cut-off now? has anything changed in your personal opinion or do you admit that you are changing your point of view depending on floyd's actions or thinking?

it is not ok not to take a drug test but it is fine to take the current commission standard since it has caught roid users in the past like jones, vargas and toney. it is also ok to ammend these current procedure of teting as long as it was done by commission. it is also a fighter's prerogative if he wants extra testing for his fight and that is my personal opinion. now i want to hear your's and not floyd's.

 

I cant speak for floyd, maybe he wants to clean up sport and be a pioneer who brought this about.

The difference with pac is he has performed better as he got heavier, at his low weight where you dont fight as long at the top as bigger men.

so pac has a few decent performnces at his low weights and then he fights from david diaz and looks pretty damn good from then on.

and is keeping his speed gained an exceptional amount moreof power and taking shots from bigger more powerful men yet shots from JMM were making his legs go buckwild.

:think

seriously whether you believe he is on peds or not you have to sit back and think about this scenarios.

therefore floyd is entitled to his drug testing demand with no questions.

 

When did i say that and why are you ignorant people forever trying to put words into peoples mouths when you "try" and debate with them.

Are you going to answer those questions or not?.

 

Read through the last page again.

Then again your thinking is so warped i am not even sure you saw it, mayb because you have selct memory and are mentally blocking bits of information you do not want to hear.

So are you going to answer my question.

Why is it ok to not take drug tests?

 

*****s are confused.

They won't admit that Floyd himself believes he cannot beat Pac (ex: "Floyd will potshot him all day").

But they agree with Floyd that Pac should take a blood test that he's never asked of anyone before. By doing so, they're admitting that Floyd is indeed not sure of himself he can beat Pac. If he is, why the special test?

 

wow you are so confused now as to find answer to my question that you failed to read my answer in my post that you have just quoted.

so answer this with your opinion spud, why is it 7 days cut-off is not fair for you now but 14 days cut-off was fair before for you? i browsed again for your previous answer but it is just a poor analogy of one version of the events. it's does not answer my question concerning your own opinion. common spud you can do it, show us if you are capable of your own opinion and not riding with the mayweathers.

 

Pugi you are an illiterate ****, read the last ****ing page, take a breath and answer the question.

Toxo ill answer your question when you do mine.

Its pretty simple i have asked them and they were yes and no answers on the most part.

But please take your time i want the best answer possible.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

There is only one reason why an Athlete would flip flop over testing.

 

z

wow spud, what question? i answered yours already and you did not even read it becasue of your confusion.

ok i'll copy-paste it for you mr spud...

"it is not ok not to take a drug test but it is fine to take the current commission standard since it has caught roid users in the past like jones, vargas and toney. it is also ok to ammend these current procedure of teting as long as it was done by commission. it is also a fighter's prerogative if he wants extra testing for his fight and that is my personal opinion."


now answer mine, why is it not fair for 7 days cut-off now but 14 days cut-off is fair then. don't give me an answer like because floyd said so..., i want your own opinion.