7 days blood cutoff w/ unlimited urine and immediate blood test after fight!

so what are these occurrence? so in your opinion, 14 days is fair initially but not fair now because of certain occurrence. is this because floyd pulled out his offer?

can you not made a judgement of what is fair and not basing it from floyd's actions? can you say that something is fair or not fair from your own opinion and not because floyd changed his mind?

 

This thread is hilarious.

You have Pac fans demanding to know why a 14-day offer is not 'fair'.

The very same 14-day offer that the vast majority of those very same fans absolutely REJECTED as 'bullsh!t' in the first place, AND that their hero walked away from the biggest fight in boxing history over.

You just can't make this stuff up.

 

No it's not fair. 14 days was a fair compromise on both parts and Pussyao ran away. Now Pussyao wants back in and having walked away from the initial compromise, he has no leverage in future negotiation. So now Floyd goes back to his initial stance and that's somehow unfair?

Yet Pussyao offers a catchweight from jump and doesn't budge, and you guys think it's somehow fair.

Why didn't Pacquiao ask these folks for a catchweight? Was he scared of DLH? Cotto? Margarito?

:deal

 

No retaliation my ass.

Floyd's word is indeed a gospel to you rabid fans.

 

Exposed.

 

did you understand how our conversation has gone? spud said the following:

no cut-off is FAIR.
7 days cut-off is NOT FAIR.
14 days cut-off is FAIR.

so why would you think 14 days is fair for him when 7 days is not fair now? is it because his opinion was influenced by floyds actions?

 

ok so you also had the same opinion with spud that 14 days cut-off was fair, 7 day's cut-off was not fair and no cut-off is fair. so your opinion of what is fair in drug testing is influenced also by floyd's actions or inactions. do you floyd fans have no honest opinion at all and is always swayed by floyd?

 

i wonder also what these certain occurrence that made 14 days cut-off as a fair test then as to make the 7 days cut-off not fair now?

look at the irony of their posts. i asked for their own honest opinion of what is fair and they based their opinion on the events so as not make floyd look bad. they are truly exposing themselves as the sheep as they are.

 

My opinion is influenced by the generally accepted rules of negotiation, and not by blind allegiance to your hero Pussyao.

Example:

This guy Joe goes to buy a car he found on Craigslist. Bob owns the car and asked for $3000 obo in his ad.

Is this unfair? No. It's just how it goes. But in *******ia Bob is somehow obligated and forced to sell the car for $2500 or else, he's somehow inferior to Joe. It makes absolutely zero sense, but inexplicable loyalty without logic or reason is requirement in *******ism, so I am not surprised.

 

up to the fight and on the day of the fight? **** floyd..

 

Thank you for showing your ignorance. I now know not to expect anything of value to come from you ever on this board. Floyd has never said anything about on the day of the fight. Please log off at your earliest convenience.

 

You can't have random testing with a cut off date. Drugs can stay in your system for a while. It is not always about what someone took yesterday.
The random PED testing is an unusual request but not an outragous demand. It would be if only one fighter were to be subjected to the random testing. However this is not the case. Both Mayweather and Pacquiao are to be subjected to the random testing.
I don't understand people who oppose random testing. I can't see how it hurts the sport.

 

It's almost a year, Floyd's camp can't even prove to the commission that these "Substances" Exists. Let alone prove to the commission that the extensive tests are really needed.

Come on Floyd, Slander the commission right now. Their testing ain't efficient right? **** them up on public, lay the scientific evidence in front of them and let you illegal substances experts back you up.

 

Floyd doesn't have to prove anything to the commission. Does Manny have to prove to the commission why he needs catch-weights? Does Manny have to prove why he needs 8oz gloves or a certain brand?

This is an agreement between 2 men. One wants a clean fight, and the other does not.

I don't know why *******s think testing is a bad idea, but most folks (fighters and fans) don't consider it a bad thing.

 

atsch wow comparing boxing negotiations to buying a car.