70 Year Old Manny Pacquiao Calls Out Terence Crawford And Errol Spence...

Fighting is a lot of things. How skilful you are, clearly, but also how long you fight. People make a lot of excuses and say "he lost because he's old not prime" etc etc. acting like only fantasy prime v prime perfect scenarios matter. Losses after prime still matter, and still lessen you as a fighter. Because you chose to fight knowing your condition, and LOST. A loss is a loss. He's fought for too long

 

I'd pick him over both

 

Talk is cheap. Either one beats him worse than Mayweather and Horn did.

 

Crawford gets rock hard about the idea of a Pac payday without having to fight Spence

but Spence is the one who'd get the Pac payday

hehe

 

Lol stop it. Don't compare Mayweather beating Pac to Horn beating Pac. Mayweather literally clean sweeped Pac, Horn vs Pac was a close ass fight with the majority thinking Pac won.

 

I would bet on Pac in a second if he were at his best at WW.

 

what?

So Ali’s loss to Larry Holmes reduces his standing as a fighter to you?

 

So does a loss early in a fighter's career matter? Hopkins lost early, I never have read anyone critisize Hopkins for that loss. Why? A loss is a loss. You know why? Fans understand, unlike you, that a young fighter has not developed the skills and early losses should be a learning lesson. Fans do put much value on older fighters losses because they lost the skills that once made them great. Let's be honest, you think the Manny that destroyed Hatton loses to any version of Ugas?

 

Mehhh

 

A loss is a loss and Pac is still the greatest fighter since Duran. If you disagree that's fine. Go stub your toe.

 

They'll duck him

 

Stay retired Pac