70s Foreman vs Vitali Klitschko

explain how its wrong to surmise you sound like you've fallen down your toilet when you keep making the noise "FLOP".

Either that, or you've evolved into an amoeba.

 

atsch Amoebas have nothing to do with boxing.

F L O P mate

:-(

 

you've turned into a bubbling tar pit? "flopping continually"

 

Like I've said previously, you're a full grown adult who has devoted a significant part of your adult life toward expressing dislike for the Klitschkos. You share these views daily with a small, mostly apathetic group of posters on a boxing subforum.

Even if you were right, you'd still be a loser.

 

Vitali will control any parts of the fight if he's at range.

My issue is when Foreman closes the gap and hurts him, we know Vitali will slug it out with him.

My belief is Vitali will fall before Foreman.

 

what does this, even though its wrong, have to do with my post u replying to?

explain your double flop, mate.

 

As long as one believes Foreman can force Klitschko to engage, then siding with Foreman in a firefight is more than reasonable.

To believe that Klitschko could control the distance for the duration of the fight, keeping Foreman at bay to his liking, seems far less reasonable.

 

I'm perfectly fine keeping Dino and the flopper active here.

 

Klitschko.

 

then shame its u who always FLOP mate.

 

the only reason you know that is because you read all of my posts you dirty rotten lair with mommy issues :nono

 

I think 70's Foreman and Vits could be a great fight :think

who would I take?

Foreman by a hair but Vits winning would not surprise me.

 

thanks for reminding me that its not just mendoza who always flop

 

FlopFLOPflopflopFlop

:-(

 

clearly you are an amoeba going places.