70's George Foreman vs. a prime Sam Peter

:roflatsch

 

Right, prime Tua lasted 12 rounds with Lewis and shot Tyson lasted 8 with Lewis. Yet a 220 lbs 70s Foreman would take them out in under 6 rounds.

You're obviously absolutely clueless.

Oh and just for the record: Prime Lewis would absolutely demolish 70s Foreman.

 

:yep You sir are correct .

 

Lennox Lewis isn't George Foreman, he's completely different you moron, they fight nothing alike, so that bull**** point is out the window. Oh and I guess you know better than Tysons legendary trainer Cus D ' Amato who told Tyson with HIS OWN MOUTH that Tyson would never beat Foreman. Tua doesn't even deserve an argument, he accomplished nothing and is a **** fighter other than chin and power

 

Who nex!

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/boxing-news/lotierzo1609.php

 

****ing OWNED. Cus's word was law with Mike.

 

Clearly a draw

 

Angelo Dundee thought Haye would beat Wlad. Trainers aren't right all the time, you know.

 

Foreman would brutalize that joke. Peter's Chin is dried horse ****, he's slow as ****, and he's a fat unskilled slob. Only Klit Klowns think that this guy is worth a flying **** in a rolling doughnut.

 

Foreman at 6'4 and 225 vs Peter at 6'1 and 240

Foreman by KO4

Foreman who has KO'd guys with punches to the back and with glancing blows should have no problem killing ol' thick neck Sam the sham Peter.

 

Like when George was 48 years old and pushing Prime Shannon Briggs around?
Or when he was moving Moorer with left hooks? What about when he fought Ron Lyle? George has handled bigger fighters and guys who were in similar size to himself.

 

Peter is f'in abysmal and his power is way overrated.

 

you must not have seen foreman-briggs

 

ryan...........do u see the guy that peter is fighting.= stiff:--(