70's George Foreman vs. a prime Sam Peter

SAM PETER COULDNT EVEN HANDLE JAMEEL MCLINE WORTH SHITT:verysad

 

Foreman at his age and condition now would destroy any version of Peter.

 

For what it's worth, calling someone a dumb **** because they use size as one of many criteria for judging a fighters ability makes no sense. If it played no part there would be no weight divisions and Pac or PBF would be Boxing World CHAMPIONNNNNN!

 

peters biggest win - knocking out glass jaw oleg mascaev
foremans biggest win- destroying joe frazier 2 times and norton once

 

He KO'd Moorer when he was 45 so lets not go there. Alos,George predidcted a late KO over Moorer so his game plan worked according to Jim Lampley.
He fought Briggs when he was 48 and was pushing him all over and only lost on a gift deciion to a 25 year old prime power punching Briggs. Ron Lyle a hard hitting monster put him down but who won? A win is a win and Lyle got ****ed up!

 

It makes a ****load of sense

 

Prime Foreman turns Peter into an african princess. Even if Peter got in a lucky shot and dropped him Foremans getting up and overpower Peter. A more even match might be 90s Foreman and I'd still favor that version.

 

It's quite ironic you mention Pac and Mayweather, as they are actually both very small guys for their weight class. By your logic Margarito should have abiliterated Pac and Ortiz should have walked through Mayweather. But guess why niether of those things happened, genius?

 

Bumping this thread

in honor of that ****** poster who's name is 'pugilist something' and who have a picture of himself smiling on a ****ing shot to **** boat.

Some funny as **** sarcastic answers in this thread

 

KO by foreman hooooooooooooooooooooooook

 

Sometimes I love your comparisons, some are really funny.

 

Obviously you're defending Bubby because he's a Klit-ite.

But in reality he is a dumb **** not because he uses size as "one of many criteria" - because he uses it as the crux of his argument. He uses it as the detrmining factor. There is a difference. You seem intelligent enough to realize that. :good

 

Peter ends Foreman's career.











































...because Foreman murders Peter so brutally that he's locked up in solitary for the next 35 years.

 

Neither is a match for Danny Williams 2003.