70's HEAVYWEIGHTS SUCKED!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boro chris, Oct 23, 2010.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    George Foreman wouldve been much bigger today, as would mos of the heavyweights from the best.. if we're going to do the fantasy thing, then fighters should be able to use weights and modern nutrition.
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,698
    11,702
    Jan 6, 2007
    Why do you use 'Yet' at the beginning of the sentence ?

    That would imply some kind of contradiction.
     
  3. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: In all seriousness IMO there should be some kind of law against people being able to have stuff like this published - it's no wonder there's so many brain washed turds around - this is the sort of stuff that's killing boxing - the young fans who might be so young they haven't even seen a film of an Ali fight or a Frazier fight - are going to be led up the garden path completely - and are going to be left with ZERO respect for the history of the sport and it's fighters - they are going to be thinking "well if Klit is as good as it gets in heavyweight history then I might just follow another sport altogether!!" - there's already enough going round on this forum who have had there brains washed by revisionist historians about the likes of Dempsey aswell - it's a complete joke
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Yes, that's what I was implying.
     
  5. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
  6. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,698
    11,702
    Jan 6, 2007
    I've reread my post and am unable to find the contradiction you suggest.

    Care to be specific ?
     
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,215
    8,756
    Jul 17, 2009
  8. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    578
    Nov 5, 2009
    Im gonna play devils advocate here and suggest maybe ESB let it ride for the sake of objectibility. Thats the only thing i can think off as its utter bollox:D
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,296
    25,675
    Jan 3, 2007
    No heavy weight from the 70's era would stand a chance against "sugar" Nikolay Valuev.
     
  10. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    It's not fair how you singled out the 70's like that.
    No fighter from any era would stand a chance against Prime SNV.
     
  11. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    Vitali would be no more than a Bugner in the 70's. (if that)
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,296
    25,675
    Jan 3, 2007
    You're right... My bad.. :oops:
     
  13. The-Beast

    The-Beast Free Boo Radley Full Member

    330
    0
    Oct 22, 2010
    I stopped when I saw Frazier vs Tua. I do not mean I stopped after reading the analysis. I mean the mere idea of a Frazier/Tua comparison stopped me.
     
  14. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Bugner was a good contender though.. And tested anybody.. I certainly see Vitali doing better then that since he would be the biggest in the era and one of the strongest next to Foreman...
     
  15. lol, "vitali klitschko stronger than gorge foreman"

    george vs vitali= foreman by tko
    ali vs wlad= ali ud
    tua vs frazier= joe by sd.
    norton vs arreola= norton by sd
    haye vs shavers = i can see both ways by ko.
    POVETKIN VS QUARRY= LMAO QUARRY WOULD ABSOLUTELY EXPOSE HIM
    JIMMY YOUNG VS CHAMBERS= JIMMY YOUNG WAS STOLEN AGAINST ALI, YOUNG BY UD ANYDAY.
    AUSTON VS LYLE= RON BY TKO
    peter vs bugner = i can see both ways.