7th world title in 7th weight division

The RING didn't list PBF as RING champ at super featherweight...
.

 

Didn't they not give out a belt for like 15 years?

Genaro was the man of 130 for a long time. Mayweather was lineal at 130.

 

OK... Just like PAC at flyweight... It wasn't listed by the RING tho PAC beat the man at 112 ...

How many different divisions PBF has titles??
.

 

5...9 titles

 

Oh really?????? You were following flyweights 10 years ago? BULL****

 

5.

130 - WBC
135 - WBC
140 - WBC
147 - IBF and WBC
154 - WBC

 

Can we say PAC is one level up over PBF with 4 lineal titles (PBF only 3) and titles in 6 different divisions (PBF only 5)...

 

no one is implying floyds resume is better then pac's. Its pretty clear pac's is superior

 

Something ***** is happening here. Do you guys want to be left alone? j/k

 

Of course. Pac is ahead of Floyd.

I dont think anyone disagrees with that.

 

theirs an MMA forum here for that kind of stuff. I think its more your style

 

He only should need 6 for 6 to be the record holder. We shouldn't be using Oscar's 6 division titles for the record to beat because consensus is that he didn't really beat Sturm at 160 (for the mighty WBO belt), and a lot of his early titles were WBO belts when that organization was even less respected.

 

Should a fighter not be undisputed at a weight class to make to weight class count?
And should all the ""super" and ""junior" weight classes be counted?

When Henry Armstrong did hold 3 titles at the same time, that was a achievement!

 

especially considering they werent any super junior bullshits. And he didnt even need catchweights

 

Exactly