8 weight divisions vs less 'world' titles: Which would benefit boxing more?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Vano-Irons, Mar 20, 2011.


  1. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest

    Provide a solution rather than silly comments.
     
  2. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Less titles across the board would be great, both at world, regional and national level.

    Having four guys able to consider themselves ''world champion'' just sounds daft..... that said it's not as bad as being called ''super'' or ''regular'' champion.
     
  3. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest

    Provide a solution dear boy.
     
  4. ScubaSteve

    ScubaSteve Dwylo o Garreg Full Member

    3,128
    0
    Nov 17, 2010
    Leave the weight divisions as they are, maybe drop 1 or 2 of the more insignificant ones. Like someone said earlier, Super-Bantam, is there only like 4 lbs difference between that and Bantam?


    Anyways, 1 "World" Champion and drop 1 or 2 weight divisions.

    As far as I'm concerned, the belts are a much bigger issue, but in an ideal world a small tidy up of the weights would be great.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Ummm....flyweight and Bantamweight? Without straw, light and super?

    Not hard really.
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008

    It's the eight lb difference between Bantam and Feather that does people in :good

    Fighting Harada, Ruben Olivares, Eder Jofre, all instances from around the same time; showed it wasn't that difficult, if you were good enough.
     
  7. ScubaSteve

    ScubaSteve Dwylo o Garreg Full Member

    3,128
    0
    Nov 17, 2010
    :good
     
  8. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Don't really mind on weight classes, just so we have a 'the man' at each one. So no ducking, you have to fight for the one title!
     
  9. roe

    roe Guest

    The only real solution is for some multi-billionaire to buy out one of the sanctioning bodies and actually run it properly like a true governing body. Kind of similar to what the UFC has done in MMA but it would need proper backing from one of the major TV networks and co-operation from all top promoters. Obviously wouldn't happen because top level fights involving the likes of Manny Pacquiao is just printing millions of dollars for someone like Bob Arum.. and there's no way he'd be happy to just give that up.

    Boxing would have to go to the dogs before this became a possibility in reality though unfortunately.
     
  10. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    1 champ or 2 champs with big unifications would do ALOT for boxing. It is so much easier for the media to report and so much easier for the casual fan to quickly point the finger at who matters when there is a fight they are interested in.