80's heavyweights was NOT a weak era

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Mar 1, 2018.


  1. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,811
    Dec 10, 2014
    I guess you weren't around. Check boxrec. I don't have to list all the fights they had with each other.
     
  2. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    80s had plenty of talent and was a fun era. A lot of the reason a lot of the fighters aren't thought of higher was the fact that they exchanged loses amongst each other and they fell off later in their careers. Holmes and Tyson were both great and dominate during the 80's but guys like Witherspoon, Thomas, Douglas, and Dokes were all very good and exchanged wins amongst each other along with a few other good heavyweights. Tucker was very talented as well but only had the one big win over Douglas. Head to head I think the guys mentioned above were every bit as good as Lyle, Quarry and even Norton.
     
    JackSilver likes this.
  3. Ken Ashcroft

    Ken Ashcroft Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    6,338
    Dec 23, 2008
    Two ATGs in Holmes and Tyson.Good solid,skilled if not spectacular fighters with the likes of Witherspoon, Thomas, Dokes, Page, Tubbs, etc. Plus the emergence towards the end of the decade of Holyfield, Lewis and Bowe in the division.

    Also we had Rocky 3 and 4 in the 80s. :number_one:
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,392
    50,036
    Apr 27, 2005
    I agree, they fought each other regularly. Myriads of matches between the top 10 guys.
     
  5. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,982
    10,464
    Jun 9, 2010
    Funny but, when I think of the '90s and what a great heavyweight era it made up, I also remember the term "Step-aside Money."

    Fortunately, the period was rich enough with talent for there to be solid match-ups made, throughout.

    In the '80s, there were plenty of matches made, between the top-10-to-15 fighters, too.
     
  6. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,621
    9,227
    Oct 8, 2013
    80s was very talented decade. The sport was booming in the 1970s with heavies, so I'm sure lot of people were taking up sport and that led to a good crop of guys hitting the scene in the 80s.

    The crack/cocaine epidemic is what destroyed the next generation from reaching the heights of the 70s not the lack of talent. That and Don King.

    So many guys had massive drug problems, Cooney, Tucker, Dokes, just to name 3 talented guys that could of been so much more.

    Even without them you had Holmes and Tyson.

    Good decade talent wise just lot of guys threw away their careers.
     
  7. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,755
    3,451
    Feb 17, 2008
    Well then lack of discipline is a weakness in their game. It certainly would not be a strength. DKP was a big problem alright but it wasn't as if Arum was doing much himself. What really hurt was Ross Smith leaving--he was the guy putting together top shelf matchups.
     
  8. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,529
    3,047
    Oct 18, 2004
    Very true. Sort of like the middleweights of the same time frame.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  9. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,137
    5,764
    Feb 26, 2009
    Good era, which is why I thought Tyson had a decent bunch of wins in 87-90.. All or most of those guys were former champs I think and solid fighters.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.