'86 Tyson vs. '74 Ali.

Go away

 

Wrong. nowhere in there did I say that Tyson took beatings from Ruddck and Bruno, I have said all along that he didn't and its really a silly argument. Again this is why I don't post much. I have to take the time to tell you that I didn't say what you accuse me of. The other guy I have been excahnging posts with is doing the same thing. typical internet conversation that makes it not worth wild. Once agon to those that can't follow conversations. I didn't belittle Tyson's easy wins like the other guy who can't follow says I said. Unless he wants to point it out to me. He has accused me of this twice and I didn't say that at all.

 

This just proves your desperation. To back up your Tyson was great argument you have to bring up that he beat a 40 year old.

 

:rofl

 

Mid 70's Ali? ehh...i'd still give it to ali but a CLOSE decision.

86' Tyson was too wild.

if it's 60's Ali then he knocks out Tyson no doubt.

 

Read my post a few spots above you. There's been half a dozen or so "ATG" HWs who never beat an in prime ATG but yet don't get any crap for it like Tyson.

 

Pro-tyson posts are meaningless here, he either doesn't have enough smarts, stamina or heart atsch

Tyson is severely underrated against Ali imo. Tyson by late round TKO

 

Then you should have just admitted that Tyson never beat a great fighter and left it at that. I agree with your point by the way. You can only fight who is put in front of you. Tyson in prime was obviously a great fighter and never beating an atg doesn't take away from that.