88 TYSON v. 93 HOLYFIELD - Who Wins? - 15 rounds

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by streetsaresafer, Aug 29, 2007.


  1. getup

    getup Say Yeah! Full Member

    1,131
    4
    Aug 15, 2004
    HOLY ALWAYS WANTED TO FIGHT TYSON..,ALWAYS...,in 84 88 91 96 97 2012 2029 holy whips his ass everytime..,always has always will!!!!!
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  2. streetsaresafer

    streetsaresafer Member Full Member

    245
    8
    May 5, 2007
    I actually think Holyfield at his best was 1990 (Douglas fight)
    But the reason I put the poll based on the 93 Holyfield is that some feel that he needed the experience of losing to Bowe the 1st time in order to learn to box more rather than get into a war.

    Question for those that voted for 88 Tyson to win - would you agree that a prime Holyfield would have been his toughest fight to date?

    Either way, I think a 90 Holyfield or 93 Holyfield wins although it would be close. I just don't see Holyfield in his prime being stopped by a prime Tyson.

    Holyfield was obsessed with Tyson, that was a big part of the reason he moved up to heavyweight. He tried to get the fight with Tyson several times, starting right after the Dokes fight Holy and his team are pleading for a fight with Tyson (winner take all). They finally signed the fight in 90, but then Tyson went out and lost to Douglas. And then of course it was signed again for Nov. 8, 1991, and Tyson gets an injured rib (Elijiah Tillery's fault) and the fight is called off.

    I wonder how both men's career's would have changed had they met in 89,
    90, or 91 instead of 96?
    Obviously if Holyfield won, he would have gotten credibility as a great fighter and legitimate heavyweight much sooner than he did.

    And if Tyson won, his stature would be much higher because one would have to believe that even if Holyfield loses to Tyson, he would have probably made it Mike's toughest fight to date, and you'd have to think there would have been public clamor for a rematch. Holyfield also has shown throughout his career that he can come back from adversity so you would have to think he'd have been a major player in the heavyweight division, even with a loss to Tyson in 89-91.

    I guess my point is that both fighters stock would be higher had they fought somewhere between 89-91, rather than the fight we got in 96 between two formidable, but clearly past their prime fighters. Also the heavyweight division as a whole would have been that much more credible in the early 90s instead of the perception that was actually there.
     
  3. Ayatollah

    Ayatollah ESB's Godliest poster Full Member

    4,524
    1,942
    May 13, 2005
    Hollyfield beats the crap out of hyped Tyson 10 out 10 times.
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  4. dawnofthedead

    dawnofthedead Member Full Member

    353
    136
    Nov 13, 2014
    After watching Holyfield destroy Tyson in 96/97' it would be very difficult to go against him regardless of when they had faced off. In 96' Holyfield had been stopped by Bowe and appeared in decline whereas Tyson had flattened Mathis, Bruno and Seldon and was in good form, almost back to his very best so for me as much as this pains me to say it, especially with me being a Tyson fan, i reckon Holyfield had his number and would have defeated him whether it had been in 92' or 96':good
     
  5. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Mike before jail would've tortured Holyfield.
     
  6. Tyson would've mauled Evander The Roid Deal Holyfield back then.
     
  7. panchman69

    panchman69 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,111
    1,892
    Sep 10, 2012
    holyfield has Tysons number. too much heart and will. something that Tyson lacked
     
    Staminakills and Reinhardt like this.
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Tyson loses to Holyfield. And anyone who says Tyson Ko's Holyfield DKSAB. Look at the guys who took Tyson the distance in and around 88 Holyfield is better than all of the guys he fought and was a much more sound boxer with one iron chin !
     
    Staminakills and Reinhardt like this.
  9. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009
    Its hard to say, there's a feeling that Holyfied just had Tyson's number but that tyson wasn't nearly the same either that holyfield beat.
    Holyfield doesn't get intimidated, which alot of fighters vs Tyson did get and were defeated before even entering the ring. And Holyfield had a good chin. Would be a close fight and I think if they fought twice, both would have 1 win. But prime Tyson was such a monster and hard to bet against at his best.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  10. dawnofthedead

    dawnofthedead Member Full Member

    353
    136
    Nov 13, 2014
     
  11. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,984
    19,025
    Oct 4, 2016

    Nope, Tyson was 30 when a 34 year old Evander beat the shitzz out of him, hardly over the hill. He was 24 when Buster Douglas knocked him out. The Evander that ko'ed Buster would do the same thing to Tyson. Tyson always had trouble with guys who didn't fold and fought back.
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  12. RacingBeat

    RacingBeat Casual lives matter Full Member

    3,721
    1,294
    Sep 14, 2013
    Not getting this fight in 1991 is still the most painful coulda been since I've been watching boxing
     
    Blackclouds likes this.
  13. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,146
    17,746
    Apr 26, 2006
  14. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    Holy was always way better than that myth of a "prime" Tyson. I guess tyson was a prime pro boxer from age 13 to 19 ? Then past it ?
     
  15. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014