9.29.08 -- One year anniversary of HBO fraud Jermain Taylor being exposed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paulfv, Sep 29, 2008.


Page 7 of 8
  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    For all your writing and effort and bombast, you are quite simply not very intelligent. Your understanding of the word "expose" is far too literal - you think if the word 'exposed' is mentioned in any context by anyone anywhere, then that is definitive proof that Jermain Taylor has been "exposed" in the wider sense of being a fraud as a boxer.

    As I said before, it is difficult to debate with someone who just doesn't understand the difference in saying for example:

    - Forrest's lack of handspeed was exposed by the younger fighter, who beat him to the punch repeatedly.

    and

    - Vernon Forrest was cruelly exposed last night as despite all his pre-fight bravado, he was dominated and stopped by his young challenger.

    You do not see the difference here, you see the word "exposed" and seize upon it as evidence of a guy (who was a good boxer, lost to a better boxer, but is still a good boxer) being a "fraud", but as I said, you don't understand this, so it's futile trying to help you.

    Enjoy your anniversary amigo, you deserve it. :lol:
     
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    #91
  2. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Pac, I'm deliberately ignoring you. You're not bringing anything to the table, you deserve no response. Now you want to try to play parsing games. Sad.

    In addition to understanding boxing better than you ever will, I also have a superior comprehension of semantics and writing to your own. I know what words mean better than you do, and I understand the context which they're used in much better than you ever could. That is one reason why your exploits are seemingly confined to ESB while my work is being discussed in places like The Wall Street Journal. You think you're cute or clever, but you're not. You're single-A -- at best -- and I'm the major leagues.

    Keep working, you need it. I don't debate fools, as I mentioned earlier in the thread. I'm not engaging you, I'm blowing you off. That is by design.
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #92
  3. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    Anybody tired of the overuse of the word "exposed"? Fighter lost, he's been exposed. Remember when Ali was exposed?
     
    Little Pea, Sep 30, 2008
    Little Pea, Sep 30, 2008
    #93
  4. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    10,241
    5,915
    Sep 5, 2008

    :clap:
     
    Salty Dog, Sep 30, 2008
    Salty Dog, Sep 30, 2008
    #94
  5. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    This is what is usually referred to as irony:

    http://www.***********.com/?m=show&id=9250
    (won't link live)

    This content is protected


    It's funny, the way in which Taylor went about exposing Pavlik, wasn't it?

    This content is protected


    I guess to each his own. Nice 'expose'-ing you did there, Jermain.

    (of yourself)
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #95
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    "I KNOW WHAT WORDS MEAN BETTER THAN YOU DO". That is a sentence that would be written by a young child who doesn't yet have a firm grasp of the English language. You are a joke!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    And how do you know my writing is confined to ESB? You really are a desperately moronic character.

    I say again: Enjoy your big anniversary. Celebrate. You do indeed deserve it. :hi:
     
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    #96
  7. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    In other words you can't back it up, hence you've just "lost" via default, if that's how u wanna view it. You've created a fantasy movement called Taylorites who show imaginary denial & nuthuggery. The odd fanatic shouldn't count.

    If you're not gonna source what you claim, I say you're a disturbed bullshitter with some serious personality disorder. Take a look at your behaviour.

    & Smoger didn't start a count. Watch the video again as you're memory doesn't seem too reliable.
     
    sitiyzal, Sep 30, 2008
    sitiyzal, Sep 30, 2008
    #97
  8. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Do us a favour, ignore us all, don't post shitty threads like this one again.

    Nobody ever seems to agree with you anyway, so I guess either you are a boxing mastermind that nobody understands, or simply ignorant.

    Stop "exposing" yourself :roll:

    PS: PACMAN84 I admire your courage, trying to actually debate with this dreamer.
     
    CarlesX7, Sep 30, 2008
    CarlesX7, Sep 30, 2008
    #98
  9. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #99
  10. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Shut the f*ck up, you moron:

    http://www.yardbarker.com/boxing/articles/Kelly_Pavlik_STUNS_Jermain_Taylor_w_TKO_Victory/29024
    6. nastylefthook , October 04, 2007
    "the fight was stopped too fast ,,
    This content is protected
    and possibly won by decision"

    http://www.sportaphile.com/2007/10/01/video-kelly-pavliks-knockout-of-jermain-taylor/
    comment number 6 by: Rod1
    October 4th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
    "WOW if that wasn’t Robbery i don’t know what is…
    This content is protected
    when Taylor was hurt"

    http://www.maxboxing.com/fischer/fischer100107.asp
    Jorge Frank, Puerto Rico

    "Also do you think if given the count,
    This content is protected
    "

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19582
    "My theory is that most of
    This content is protected
    have a serious grudge against Taylor for one reason or another and simply wanted to see him take a bigger beating."

    "
    This content is protected
    .....no count out is BS"

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080212110908AAcZj1w
    Johnny Awesome
    "Well first off,
    This content is protected
    "

    I can source everything I claim. But I don't do others' research for them. You're a clown, and one who has both a bad memory and is flat-out wrong. Just as I said.

    You want to take issue with Smoger not starting a count, you talk with the writer who wrote that piece, not I.

    Read more, talk less. You are pathetic. You said no one claimed that Taylor could have gotten up. I shut you up immediately with a source, last night. You lose. I don't need any more sources. That's how it works. You want to look up more sources, go for it.

    But, more sources are easily found. Just ask nastylefthook, or Doug Fischer. The talk that Taylor should have gotten a count was everywhere, as was the talk that he could have beaten that count had it been given. If you looked at the article I cited with Smoger remarking Taylor was out, you'll see it was not written immediately after the fight. Know why that is? Because Smoger took sh*t from clowns like you and so he came out later and made sure people knew that JT was done after Pavlik's assault.

    You're an idiot. You'll get NO victories agaisnt me, including technical ones.
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #100
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I really wish his mother hadn't "exposed" herself to his father, and allowed this creature to be born. That woman has wasted ESB for the rest of us. This guy is an absolute mess.
     
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    DINAMITA, Sep 30, 2008
    #101
  12. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Another who knew ahead of time what I did about Pavlik vs Taylor:

    http://unlimitedfightnews.com/wordpress/?p=548
    Michael DeLuca
    September 26th, 2007 @3:50 am

    "
    This content is protected
    ."

    Yep, and that's precisely what happened. As Iole said in a previous post I made, that is to say a flawed fighter who is good but not great, and nothing close to the guy HBO and his fans made him out to be.

    Just another exposed fraud.

    Ha ha ha.
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #102
  13. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Too late now, fatso. You've already lost. As PROVEN by you resorting to calling me naughty names.

    From every forum & news pages over the internet all you can find is about four bitter comments?? Jesus christ. Go find some more. By the way you're moaning I'd expect endless threads in this forum, (which would be easy to find) from outraged "Taylorites". The odd fanatic or whiner should be ignored, so calm down. And stop lying about everything.

    Take being exposed (ironic, you being exposed isn't it?) like a man. You clearly have some serious personal issues you need to address.

    If not, using your own words, just kick back, & relax.
     
    sitiyzal, Sep 30, 2008
    sitiyzal, Sep 30, 2008
    #103
  14. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    This content is protected


    "a favour?"

    Oh, sh*t, you're a yellow-toother. No wonder you're crying.

    Of course they don't agree with me, that's often the burden of being intelligent:

    "The philosopher, as a man indispensable for tomorrow and the day after the morrow, has ever found himself, and has been obliged to find himself, in contradiction to the day in which he lives; his enemy has always been the ideal of the day."

    - Nietzsche
    "Beyond Good and Evil"

    Let me help you with a rough translation:

    Smart people aren't usually agreed with when they speak their mind. It's usually later that those around the smart person realize the smart person knew something they didn't. The smart person isn't a sheep, and can't get caught up in being one.

    I'm not concerned with people agreeing with me. I'm concerned with being correct. The herd doesn't need to believe what I say, I'm ok with their dissent.
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2008
    #104
  15. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    You are intelligent... Ok, and I'm an astronaut.

    It's been a year since the Pavlik-Taylor fight, hence "later". I still don't see anyone agree with you on this one.

    Smart men are sometimes wrong too, and admit their mistakes.
    It doesn't sound so "smart" to think you are always correct and think of people who don't agree with you as "sheep".
     
    CarlesX7, Sep 30, 2008
    CarlesX7, Sep 30, 2008
    #105
Page 7 of 8