JMM can pull of the upset and win a decision vs Manny. Where does this place JMM on the list of Mexican ATG? Ahead of JCC, Salvador? You tell me...
Anything can happen...i.e. Tyson vs Douglas. Like I said, what if he can pull it off...is he the #1 ATG in Mexican boxing history.
If marquez wins it will be epic, you have to consider him of of the very best ever mexican boxers. Right now he is very good but still clearly behind sanchez,chavez and also napoles morales and barrera, its a bit of a longshot but the legacy boost will be great if he pulls it off.
IMO he is already ahead of Morales and Barrera, if he wins Saturday night, especially if its a clear win, I think he should be #1.
Courtesy of espn.com 5 reasons why JMM wins... The buck stops here A draw and a razor-thin victory in this rivalry has left a sweet-and-sour taste in the mouths of both fighters. Each would love to finish this rivalry in explosive and conclusive fashion, but it's clear that Marquez is the one who needs the landslide victory in order to claim any sense of superiority against his rival. So far, it appears Marquez has a sharper realization of this fact than Pacquiao. If the Mexican fighter can use this imperative need for victory to help maintain focus through perhaps another 12 hard rounds, it's possible he'll reach the home stretch with enough rounds in the bank to clinch a decision -- when it will be too late for Paquiao to regain lost terrain. Last call for history This fight against Pacquiao is, potentially, Marquez's last chance to fight a top-five pound-for-pound opponent during his career. After his tremendous failure against Floyd Mayweather Jr., Marquez should know this is his final opportunity to add another important line to his pre-approved application for admission into the Hall of Fame. A defeat, including a late stoppage, wouldn't significantly damage his legacy, but a win would place him in the pantheon of the greatest Mexican fighters ever, adding a fourth world title to his collection (an achievement that is still up for grabs in Mexican boxing history, depending on which historian you believe) against the best fighter of his era, and putting an end to Pacquiao's historic 14-fight winning streak compiled at the highest possible level. Surprise factor There's a catch when analyzing a bout with so many precedents. Both fighters know each other all too well after having shared a ring for 24 hard-fought rounds, and all signs point toward some kind of repetition of the same recipe. But we can't rule out the possibility that Pacquiao or Marquez may have discovered, after reviewing the tapes, an error or omission that cost him in those fights. If Marquez, a resourceful fighter guided by one of boxing's greatest strategists in Nacho Beristain, can find a flaw in Pacquiao's style to concentrate on, an upset could be brewing. After all, Marquez likely wouldn't have accepted this third fight if he hadn't found a new approach to beating Pacquiao -- something he came so close to doing in those previous meetings. The bet here is that Marquez will bring something entirely new (or further emphasize a single tactic he previously used) that could potentially turn the fight in his favor. Indomitable spirit Pacquiao has a peculiar way of pummeling his opponents into submission with an overwhelming accumulation of punishment, all while relying on undervalued defense. Let's remember the faces of Marco Antonio Barrera and Erik Morales after they were sent to the canvas by Pacquiao, offering glassy-eyed looks at their corners and being unable to articulate their frustration after their respective beatings. After such defeats, most of Pacquiao's opponents have no problem admitting defeat. But Marquez never accepted the victory and draw that Pacquiao escaped with from their two fights, and he refuses to believe Pacquiao is unbeatable. If he's that desperate to set the record straight, Marquez should continually revisit those reasons to fuel his motivation and demonstrate, this time with greater clarity, that he's one of the few fighters in the world capable of bringing Pacquiao's run to a halt. Late bloomer Both in the course of his fights and during his career in general, Marquez has shown a penchant for slow, steady improvement. He took his time in becoming a world-class fighter, and after he achieved it, he continued to give away the advantage to his opponents in the first half of fights, only to end up turning up the heat late to claim victory. He has become quite proficient at this fourth-quarter style of fighting (as evidenced against Juan Diaz), but too often this tactic manifests as a disadvantage. If Marquez could make this strategy work, coaxing Pacquiao into wearing himself down by throwing more punches early in the fight and eventually losing steam, then coming on strong at the end, he might have a better chance of closing the show and clinching a points win. In each of the two previous Pacquiao fights, Marquez won the last two rounds on every scorecard. If he can stretch that advantage another few rounds, maybe he can change history this time around.
If the extra weight gives him power, If he lands a right hand well maybe he could hurt Pac, But I would never predict it. Pac UD I feel.
That is the shittest article by the shittest writer in sports. Dan Rafael - knows **** all about boxing. when he picks a fighter he picks reasons like "heart" or "feelings", "cos he wants to win , one more time!"- what the **** is that, everyone wants to win- its a ****ing fight! he knows nothing of boxing strategy, mechanics, tactics, or how to analyse a fight from a experts perspective. he can only fall back on sporting cliches- to justify his picks. i dont know how a fat guy who has never been in a gym unless its to shower with buff guys- gets to write for espn. honestly. i look at dan rafael and i see elie seckbach in a suit in in 30 years- honestly.
I read that and was somewhat disappointed in this article. I thought reasons 1 through 4 were the same reason, just different variations or ways of saying basically... he wants it more.
it's not by Rafael... I thought it was at first, but this doesn't fit this style. He actually gives more technical reasons versus motivational, I was disappointed and checked who the author was... it's Diego Morilla. Dunno who that is.
No way in hell he'll be above those 2. Above Morales and Barrera for sure, above the likes of Zarate, but not quite up there with the likes of Saldivar and Canto, let alone the big 3: Chavez, Sanchez, Olivares.