90s Foreman vs Lamon Brewster

Meehan did better against Brewster than Klitschko did , a lot better in fact.. I had Meehan winning that fight.

Kali pasted Brewster with plenty of shovel type shots. You would see old Foreman do the same

 

That Brewster would beat Forerman from the Stewart fight. George didn't have Meehan's activity level.

 

Foreman would not lose to Brewster.
Brewster has nothing to cause Foreman much trouble.

 

Foreman beat zero fighters with durability and big power during his comeback, maybe ever, but okay.

 

Brewster was a B-level or C-level fighter. Like has been said, he lost to Shufford, Etienne, Liakhovich, he struggled with Meehan badly,
He's upper journeyman level.

 

Foreman was B level in the 90s. Brewster has a better win than Foreman logged in his entire career, and he went through hell to earn it.

 

Has someone hacked your account?
I don't remember you posting such dumb stuff before.
What is it, World Troll Day ?

 

Does Ross Puritty have a better win than Foreman, too? Because they both beat Wlad the exact same way. (LOL)

George Foreman was the World Heavyweight Champion in the 90s.

I met Lamon Brewster. Hung out with him. Great guy. Had a great run as champ. Loved to watch all his title fights. His loss to Liakhovich was epic. I have nothing but positives to say about Brewster.

But no version of George Foreman in the 90s isn't getting tired and falling down in round five, unable to catch his breath, because he went all out for an early KO, like Wlad did against Brewster.

Early 90s George stops Lamon. Late 90s George decisions him. No version of George loses to him.

 

Thats not what happened. . Brewster didn't allow him catch a breath , he ran the gas tank clean out of him with pressure. . Kinda like how Ali beat Foreman actually

 

No one can actually seriously believe that beating Wladimir Klitschko (who was KO'd in 2 by Sanders 3 fights / 13 months earlier) for "the vacant WBO title" is a better win than any GEORGE FOREMAN had in his entire career. It's so obviously false, it's ridiculous.

 

Brewster beat Wlad closest to his prime.

Foreman wouldn’t like that combination of durability and power. He didn’t have the lateral movement to escape. He’d get TKO’d late. It would be like Stewart x 2.

Where did you meet Lamon? I walked by him at Tarver—Johnson but didn’t bother him. My friend went to his gym in West LA a couple of time, but I didn’t go with him.

 

Oh, you used the word “obviously” so it must be right. No, Wlad at that point was more of a problem h2h than anyone George beat, ever.

 

Yes, you are clearly wrong.

Okay, Wlad was such a problem h2h but he just happened to get KO'd twice by low-ranked fighters in a space of 13 months, in a space of 4 fights?

 

He also lost once in a 12 year period at the top of the division, and it was to Brewster.

Jimmy Young lost about 1/3rd of his fights, so what does that make George?

 

I hung out with him at the Rahman-Barrett fight. I interviewed him. Then I sat with him while he spoke to the WBA President. Ruiz was the WBA champ at the time, and WBA's president was trying to talk Brewster into fighting Ruiz. Lamon was all for it. (LOL)