Basically Holmes of the Mercer fight in Klitschko’s era, in this hypothetical, he’s also the step-brother of Vitali Klitschko, to replicate Wlad’s situation. He also stays 42 as he was in the Mercer fight, he’s as he is in that fight for the whole era. I’d say he loses to Sanders, Povetkin, Ibragimov, Byrd, Haye and maybe Pulev, but beats Thompson, Brewster, Chagaev and the other guys who were decent. How do you think he does?
He does poorly. I'll give him the respect of being a contender, but that's as far as I can push it. The former Soviet block guys are too young and skilled with their extensive amateur career to lose to a 42 year old Holmes with diminished reflexes. Sanders an explosive southpaw also is extremely dangerous for a man of Holmes age. He could possibly outpoint Thompson but Brewster, that's tough, Lamon wasn't called relentless for nothing, that's a tough man to keep off you for 12 rounds at an advanced age. At 45 Holmes nearly beat McCall but McCall didn't have the engine of Brewster. Holmes was cagey enough that he would probably pick up one surprise win on the list, of someone you wouldn't expect but he loses most of the matchups vs this lot of fighters. Winning some moral victories by lasting the distance.