The only fighter to beat Pac in his true prime was Marquez. Morales beat a younger Pac but Pac was lacking in skills.Marquez knocked out Pac when his physicality and his skills were prime.
Regardless it was a very faded Barrera. I think both prime Barrera and Morales would've beaten Marquez.
As an unbiased fan of all three, this is how they rank: Erik Morales Juan Manuel Marquez Marco Antonio Barrera If anyone has Barrera higher than Morales, stop embarrassing yourself.
I said; " If anyone has BARRERA higher than MORALES, stop embarrassing yourself."..... Morales has the better wins, and Morales also beat the men that beat Barrera.
Some of you seem to be under the impression that all JMM ever did was KTFO6.:-( Marquez arguably beat Pac in 3 different divisions. He's also a 3 division world champ(4th div was stolen from him). That alone is enough to place him above Morales and MAB. Personally I'm a big fan of all three and don't care where they're ranked against each other but Marquez in the very least belongs with MAB, MOrales and Pac .:deal
Marquez' longevity has IMO done more than enough for him to be placed above MAB and Morales. I personally thought he went 2-1-1 against Manny and had the most convincing win in their 4 matches. I also loved his fights at lightweight against Baby Bull and kastidis, those were just epic wars. He's won titles in multiple weight classes and has achieved a longer level of success than those other 2 great Mexican fighters.
You guys are just going to have to get over it. MARQUEZ did not beat Pacquiao in the first three fights. You can't call robbery on a close fight. In the more significant fights with Pacquiao he lost and received draw.
Arguably and actually doing it are two different things ..But honestly outside of Manny who else stands out on his resume ? old Casamayor ?Juan Diaz ? Marquez for sure has worked his way up in the Mexican legends catagory .Shame he lost to Bradley after his most brilliant performance he should have hung them up right there ..