A classic view of the ring belt

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by nip102, Dec 7, 2009.


  1. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    suppose your right

    saying that even if Oscar runs it corruptly its still better than the other organisations
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,980
    48,046
    Mar 21, 2007

    It is, and I don't think it will be run corruptly. But historically, I don't think the likely perception would be that it's right. Imagine if Don Kind owned the WBC?
     
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    I honestly beleived it wil be run correctly, maybe when looked bakc upon it will cast a shadow on it.

    What you onw about Don King practilly ran the WBC in the 80s
     
  4. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    sulaman is bad enough.If you think about it the orgs make their money by % of purses ,so a popular fighter makes them more money thats a highly fishy conflict of interest
     
  5. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    yeah i beleive it will the ring needs to be seen as credible to survive
     
  6. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    It hasnt been changed yet, but the point is it was, and would always be better, when it was totally impartial because of no connection to a "promoter".
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    As long as Golden Boy or any promontional company owns the Ring there should be questions?
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    It is the best belt out there. Fair, and with history. A fighter can only lose it in the ring or if he reties, and it takes a #1 vs a #2 or #3 to crown a new champion.