An extract from- Harry Wills a shot for glory denied Between 1915 and 1927, Harry Wills was one of the best fighters, if not the best, in the heavyweight division. Yet, he never got his chance to fight for the heavyweight championship. Like other black fighters in the early part of the past century, Harry Wills was nothing but a footnote in boxing history. What denied Wills his place in history was the color of his skin. At a time in which the heavyweight championship was considered the purview of the Caucasian race, Harry Wills tilled in the heavyweight division hinterland. After Jack Johnsons reign as champion ended, white promoters were determined not to allow blacks a whiff at the championship belt. Jack Johnsons personal conduct outside the ring scandalized White America as modesty and humility were not part of his make up. Jack Johnson essentially gave White America the middle finger as he violated every taboo of his time. Jack Johnson found white women more to his liking as he said, Every colored lady I ever went with two-timed me, white girls didnt. And when he was not bedding white women, he was beating white heavyweights. He did not just beat his opponent; he taunted and tortured them before beating them. Ring Ladner described Jack Johnson as that grinning Negro whose delight was in whipping purpose. Johnson spent the last years of his championship reign outside the country and eventually lost his title to Jess Willard under the scorching Havana sun. Harry Wills came into his own as a fighter after Johnson relinquished his title in 1915. A strong fighter and big for his era, Harry Wills used his size to an advantage. Black boxing historian Keith Smith told me in an EMAIL interview that Harry Wills skills, would be considered good for his day. His strength was his asset. He could move other men around the ring as he pleased. He couldnt understand why he never did receive a title shot. He was considered the top contender for almost seven years. No number one contender could be ignored for that long today--but the racial tones of that time simply would not allow such a bout Kevin Smith added that Wills was at his best during the late teens and the early 20s. If Dempsey had fought Wills then, it would have been a great fight. Luis Firpo, a similar fighter to Wills, nearly ended Dempseys reign as champion when he knocked the Manassa Mauler out of the ring. Firpos eventual loss did not diminish the fact that a Wills-Dempsey bout in 1920 or 1921 would have been a splendid event. Dempsey was not invincible, as Tunney would later show. Wills developed his boxing skills by fighting several quality opponents including the great Sam Langford, Sam McVey, and Joe Jeannette. Harry Wills will be remembered less for the fights that he did fight and more for the championship fight that never came. It is hard to truly judge Wills skills, since there are very little films of Wills fighting and we only have second hand reporting to depend upon. Much of this comes from white reporters, who were bias against the black heavyweight from the Big Easy. Racism denied Wills his shot at heavyweight glory. That is the fact. Kevin Smith stated, His strength was his asset. He could move other men around the ring as he pleased, then put them in position and land as he saw fit. He was a master of holding and hitting (which in the teens was considered an art form and not frowned upon as much as it is today). An athletic man for his size with one punch knock out power, Wills dominated most of the heavyweight division. Smith considered Wills one of the best between 1915-1922. As he declared, Besides Dempsey, and an old (but still great) Langford, I can't see anyone who would be considered a favorite over Wills. In 1919, Jess Willard decided to put his championship up for grab. As the Great White Hope who ended the Johnson championship reign, Jess Willard was Americas hero. Having fought only once over the previous four years since defeating Jack Johnson, Willard was ripe for the picking. As with many fighters in the early part of the century, much debate centered about Willards boxing skills. Forced into exile due to the Mann Act, Jack Johnson wasnt the same fighter as the boxer who massacred Jim Jefferies five years earlier. While Willard reputation was built on defeating Johnson, Willard beat an old Johnson and merely outlasted the older and less conditioned fighter. It is hard to truly judge Willard, so we only have second hand accounts gathered through the oral history of past boxing historians as well as newspaper accounts. Nat Fleischer considered Willard, one of the poorest of the heavyweight champions.... Jess was a slow moving pugilist who disliked training as much as he disliked the sport. Seymour Rothman of the Toledo Blade provided another point of view when he wrote that Willard was truly equipped to be a champion. He had a long left arm, which held off eager opponents. His right hand punches were devastating. Willards size and endurance was his major asset. Tex Rickard, the major boxing promoter from 1910 till his death in 1929, told his financial backers that he would never match Willard with a black fighter. Roger Kahn noted that for Rickard, the issue was as much about money as racism. Rickard told one of his financial backers, If a ****** wins the championship, then the championship isnt worth a nickel. This reasoning eliminated both Sam Langford and Harry Wills. By this time, Langford was past his prime but Wills was at his peak as a fighter. His strength and durability would have made the Willard-Wills fight an interesting proposition. As Kevin Smith told me, When you meet Sam Langford 18 times over and live to tell about it---you are a serious fighter. I guess it can best be said that Harry Wills was legit. He had size, speed, power, a bit of grace, and a great deal of experience. Rickard denied Wills his first chance at the heavyweight title. While Kahn would write that Rickards major concern was making money, he added that with Rickard, The issue was money, not prejudice. Or anyway money before prejudice. Rickards racism played a role in denying Wills his shot at the championship throughout his career. (Rickards impact cant be underestimated. Rickards control of the sport in the 20s would make modern day promoters Don King and Bob Arum envious.) After racism eliminated Wills from contention, it created Jack Dempseys date with destiny as he destroyed Willard over three rounds in a display of ferocity rarely seen in heavyweight fighting. As Dempsey ruled the heavyweight division, beating what was left of white contenders, Wills toiled unknown to the white boxing audience. With no more legitimate white heavyweights left, Jack Dempsey decided to take a break from fighting in 1923. The only contenders left was a former light heavyweight named Gene Tunney and Harry Wills. Wills, unfortunately, had another opponent- age. Roger Kahn makes it clear in his autobiography that Jack Dempsey was willing to fight Harry Wills. Dempsey signed contracts to fight Wills on two different occasions but reneged when finances failed to materialize. Roger Kahn noted about Dempsey, Not awed by Wills, Dempsey was afraid of something else: boxing without getting paid. Wills, six years older than Dempsey, was running out of time. Despite being the number one challenger for close to a decade, time was eroding Wills skills. The age factor started showing up when he lost to Sharkey and barely beating a raw Luis Firpo. Smith pointed out; Wills was past his prime when he fought Sharkey and pretty much there against Firpo. His loss to Sharkey and Basque contender Paolina Uzcudun in 1927 ended his chances for a title shot. In particular, his loss to Sharkey gave white promoters an excuse to end Wills quest for the title. His narrow victory over Firpo merely confirm in the minds of white writers and boxing analysts that Wills did not really deserve a chance at either Tunney or Dempsey. Grantland Rice summed up most reporters attitude when he wrote about Wills after the Firpo fight, Wills is not a fighter in Dempseys class, not even close. (Roger Kahn pointed out in his biography on Jack Dempsey that Tex Rickard had many of the nations sport writers on his payroll. They merely echoed his thoughts about the Wills inferiority as a boxer.) While Dempsey never feared Wills, his managers did. Kevin Smith declared, Many of the men who ran boxing thought that if Dempsey and Wills fought the latter would win and that is why the bout never took place. Wills was too much of a threat. Others are not as sure. Roger Kahn, Dempseys biographer, stated, Harry Wills would have proved to be nothing more than another quick Dempsey knockout. What was lost in this debate is Harry Wills age. Harry Wills was six years older than Dempsey and as the 1920s began, Wills was already past 30 years of age. Many of the fights that eliminated Wills from serious competition occurred after Wills turned 35. Dempsey always had the advantage of youth on his side. Wills best years were already behind him and if he proved to be an easy mark for Dempsey, his age would be the key factor. Kevin Smith summed up Wills dilemma when he told me that, The fact that Harry was black is about the only reason that he did not get a title shot.
COLOR LINE ERASED BY JACK DEMPSEY; Champion Reverses Attitude and Announces He'll Take On Wills or Anybody Else. SAYS HE NEEDS THE MONEY Yearns for Action and Plenty of it and Hopes Brennan Match Will Be First of a Series. Will Be at the Ringside. Wants to Do a Lot of Boxing.ave Jack Dempsey has erased the color line and stands ready to make a match with a colored fighter, either Harry Wills or another. This statement is contained in an announcement given out for publication yesterday by the International Sporting Club, which will stage the bout between Wills and Fred Fulton at the Newark Sportsmen's Club next Monday. New York Times July 19, 1920, Monday Section: Sports, HARRY WILLS PUNISHMENT According to vows taken by Jack Dempsey at his Saratoga camp, Harry Wills has eliminated himself as a championship possibility. Wills, through his manager, Paddy Mullins, attempted to stop the Firpo-Dempsey fight with injunction proceedings on the grounds that he had a prior right to meet the champion. Dempsey had asserted his intention of meeting Wills shortly. Now he will never meet him. Not until some promoter waves $400,000 or more in his vicinity. Time magazine Monday, Sep. 17, 1923
Smith says many of the men who ran boxing thought that if Dempsey and Wills fought, Willis would win. I must ask who is he referring to here? Names with quotes in context would have greatly enhanced his point. There is no doubt Wills deserved a title shot while Dempsey was champion. Blame politics or the funding if you will, but the thinking of the time was Dempsey did very well vs the taller / slower movers, ( Fred Fulton, Jess Willard, and Carl Morris ) and would have defeated Wills. I do think Wills was vulnerable to punchers, and had some questionable intangibles when the going got rough. Indeed, Wills was Ko'd by a nobody and quit in short order when he hurt his arm. Wills also fouled out in two fights, one of which happened when he was taking a beating from Jack Sharkey. Wills had one more chance at a legacy, but declined multiple times to meet George Godfrey in the ring. Perhaps Wills best opponents were Langford and McVey from 1914-1916. While Langford and MCvey were slightly past their prime, Wills pretty much split with them in these years. The difference is McVey and Langford scored KO wins over Wills. Wills did not knock either Langford or Mcvey out until they were well past their primes. With the only film of Wills being when he was past his best vs Uzcudun, he is he's a bit hard to place.
Wills should retrospectively be listed as World Champion between 1923 and 1926 whilst Dempsey didn't fight but had the gall to call himself champion. Wills then lost his belt after losing to Jack Sharkey in 1926 and Dempsey regained the belt in 1927 then lost it to Tunney in their 2nd fight. This would be fair as there is no way on earth Jack Dempsey should be regarded as a champion during a 3 year period of non fighting!
Okay. I have to say i'm a bit sceptical, though. In the same climate of racism and color bar, there was also a black middleweight and welterweight champion of the world, as well as various black vs white fights, even where the black fighter got the decision. By the way, whose writing was it?
[FONT="]While this quote seems true on the surface, I am not sure if 100% true. Jackson and Johnson were lineal and British champions pre 1911. Jeffries gave a four round match to a black fighter ( griffin ) while he was champion, and Johnson gave a title shot to Battling Jim Johnson while he was champion. The true answer here could be middle weight, or light heavyweight as both division had to wait until the 1920's before a black champion emerged.[/FONT]
Dempsey should have fought Wills in 1920. He probably would have beat him, as Kearns always insisted, those big guys who rely largely on size, shoving and strength were the ones Dempsey thrived against. But then maybe Wills has more going for him than I imagine, I do think he was a great fighter. And the point is he deserved a shot, which simply isn't debatable. Dempsey was paid unprecedented amounts of money to defend against Georges Carpentier, it's no wonder then that he didn't need Wills, a much more dangerous fighter.
I dont know if Id be quoting either Kahn or Smith for this argument. Kahn is about as biased a Dempsey lover as one can be and Smith has his own agenda going towards Wills and other black fighters of the era. That being said I think Wills was deprived a shot at the title for two reasons, he was black, and he was at least an even odds bet to beat Dempsey making him too dangerous an opponent for Dempsey to risk his title against. Rickard and Kearns werent letting anyone with a shot at beating Dempsey near the title. It just so happened they didnt think Tunney had a shot either...
I'm not sure if Wills was more dangerous for Dempsey. Dempsey could pretty much KO whomever he can hit, and has a track record of doing very well vs bigger slower opponents. Wills was there to be hit, and he could be knocked out, as slightly past their prime versions of Langford and McVey proved. Wills also had some dog in him and would foul out or quit when the going got rough. Such a weakness becomes magnified when facing a hard-hitting aggressive guy in Dempsey. In addition, I think Tunney's smarts, style, superior durability, and never-ending stamina diminish Dempsey's punchers chance. While Wills deserved a title shot, was the money ever as much as what Dempsey made for Tunney? Kearns and Rickard were very much into the prize money. Dempsey would fight whoever Rickard and Kearns lined up for him.
I wonder if perhaps Tommy Gibbons might have been a higher risk oponent on paper than Wills was. He at least presented the risk that he might outbox Dempsey.
Perhaps. Remember this was an "email" interview that, at the time, I did not know was for an article. I guess I could have expounded. I must ask who you are referring to here? Names with quotes in context would greatly enhance your point. And Doc dosen't count. You never learn do you--or you never read what people post. I think we had this same discussion 5 years ago. Wills "broke" his wrist, or forearm, I can't remember which, in the Jim Johnson fight you always refer to. That is not simply hurting your arm. Who is this nobody you speak of --Kid Cotton? Do you know the particulars of that fight? When he was taking a beating from Sharkey(when he was far past it--you fail to mention) he fouled out--no doubt about it--sort of like Demspey did, except, Jack got to finish his combo with a left hook. I find it funny that you take semi shots at Wills, insinuating that he wasn't that tough or shrunk when the going got tough----that is pretty funny. They guys entire career was pretty tough, and he had some long grueling battles with some very hard men. To jump to conclusions as you have, based on a few results you seem to have little info on, is just bad judgement on my opinion. Another point you completely ill use. Godfrey challenged Dempsey, Tunney, Gibbons, etc as well--but they never fought him either. By the way, how is fighting Godfrey a legacy fight for Wills and not Dempsey or Tunney? Wills had nothing to gain by fighting George in 1925 and quite frankly, at this time, George had not real claim to a fight with Wills. McVey knocked out Wills when? [/quote] Its even more difficult when you haven't really studied anything about the man's career. I maintain that Wills was a more experienced, bigger, stronger fighter than Dempsey, when both were in their prime, and he was a more proven quantity. This stuff about Dempsey feasting on big, slow guys is hog wash. Dempsey never fought anyone with the skills, size, power, quality experience and record that Wills brought to the table. Dempsey never beat anyone close to Sam Langford, even a past his prime Langford. The best fighter he fought, beat him twice. I just don't get the denial sometimes. Dempsey and his people avoided Wills--because he knew there was a chance, a very good chance--that he could lose. That was what was going on.
7 years is pretty long to NOT fight your number 1 rank contender though. Marciano, Ali, Louis would not have stand for that type of stuff. They mostly knock down the rank number 1 as soon as they were able to climb the ranking.