A defence of Jess Willard

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Aug 31, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,179
    20,838
    Sep 15, 2009
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,179
    20,838
    Sep 15, 2009
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  5. Tomsharkeyfan1

    Tomsharkeyfan1 New Member Full Member

    44
    0
    May 20, 2012
    In an interview, gunboat smith spoke about willard's durability.

    I've seen the film of willard's fight with frank moran - willard possessed a good jab.

    Willard's main problem was his lack of aggressiveness against his opponents.
     
  6. Tomsharkeyfan1

    Tomsharkeyfan1 New Member Full Member

    44
    0
    May 20, 2012
    To janitor - you have phenomenal knowledge of the oldtimer
    boxers.

    Are there any good news articles about gunboat smith and frank moran?
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,179
    20,838
    Sep 15, 2009
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Harry Wills, Sam Langford, GunBoat Smith, Sam Mcvea, Joe Jeanette all would beat a fat blubbery 37 year old johnson in a FIGHT TO THE FINISH in 1915.....

    How many could beat him in 15 rounds? Maybe none, but neither could willard



    Frank Moran, a white gooftrooper gave johnson all he could handle in 1914
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
    I tink you are reading too much into the fight to the finish part.

    The relity is that Johnson woul have stopped most of these fighters bfore the distance became an issue. He could easily have made Willard fight him over 15 or 20 rounds if he had so chosen.

    Langford would have beaten him post 1910 in my oppinion, but you have sded aginst me onthi issue.

    Johnson would have beaten McVea or Smith at any point in the tmeline you could pick. He just had their number.

    The bottm line is that they didn't do it, Willard did.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
    Cheers.

    I didn't know of any articles on these guys, and one on Smith is long overdue.

    If there is anything specific you want to know, I can try to find a contemporary newspaper article.
     
  12. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    Well I though Irineu threw a lovely feint,sorry I meant faint.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,179
    20,838
    Sep 15, 2009
    Could have and would have are two different things though. On paper he could have beaten Willard as he was wholly unproven. On paper Tyson could have beaten Douglas. So as i said, anyone COULD have beaten Johnson, but Willard was the one who got there first.

    Willard wasn't a special talent, he was durable enough to handle Johnson's power and good enough to beat Moran impressively. that's about the sum of it really.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,408
    26,864
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,179
    20,838
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm not arguing against him, I give him credit for beating a faded star. However to compromise with could/would we can discuss favourites to victory but even that is a funny one because noone would have been a favourite over Johnson, but with the use of hindsight I can say I'd make Black Dynamite, Smith and Fulton favourites over the 1915 Johnson.

    Outlasting pretty much anybody? on what do you base that statement?