A defetaed champion deserves a rematch alone,not his brother.

Great so when the brother's fighti eachother if this is the logic?

 

People get pissed off because you have to fight both brothers?

A . Beat Wlad. get IBF/WBO/WBA/IBO/RING belts and a good pay cheque
B . Beat Vitali. get WBC. Get even bigger pay day
C . Beat Wlad again in a rematch in an even bigger pay day

People are only complaining because they cant do it, only person who came close to beating both brothers was Corrie Sanders

 

Deserve's got nothing to do with it

 

You do realize it was a mandatory fight? The purse split was set by the WBC, it wasn't a matter of them "giving" anything.

You continue to display your lack of boxing knowledge, log off.

 

1.8 = peanuts ?
Ortiz made a bit more then that against Mayweather. :roll:

 

I don't really see the issue here. K Bros are the only ones with legit belts, they give you the highest paydays available in the heavyweight division, if you beat both of them you automatically have a great boxing legacy. If you beat one... WHy wouldn't you want to beat the other? Who else is there to fight after beating Vitali or Wladimir that has any significance?

 

Povetkin was Wlad´s mandatory and K2 won the purse bid and Povetkin would have earn more than 3 Million Dollars.

 

spot on, although the chances of two brothers monoplosing the world titles in any other part of HW history is zero.

This could only happen today, when HW boxing is full of ****.

 

I think you mean 'best person who couldbe bothered enough to do it', considering this - if a fortysomething fatty is the best capable one whom came close, then no one who is young fit and more capable is surely bothering to try. Certainly a fatty Corrie would have no chance of even coming close to contending in another era.

Theres plenty with the potential to take out the Klits but they aint interested in a career where you can odds on end up permanently braindamaged.