A Fair And Balanced Аssessment Of The Frequently Belittled Resume Of Gennady Golovkin

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Nov 23, 2015.


  1. Steve_Fox

    Steve_Fox Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,838
    212
    Sep 13, 2014
    still . ggg resume is ****
    beating bums,tomato cans or jr mws wont make ggg great
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    238,510
    229,387
    Nov 23, 2013
    Soon another undefeated fighter will be added, one whom I can't make too many excuses for.:yep
     
  3. adokei

    adokei Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,864
    158
    Feb 28, 2016
    "I'm sure its not a coincidence that the majority of his detractors happen to be Floyd fans, Cotto fans, Canelo fans or Ward fans."

    Those are the big boxing groups, along with pacroid and cheato.
    we knew all along that the pac.tar.ds would become ggg goodboys.
    you like unbeatable gods.
    the resume you dug up is trash and garcia's is better.
    oh. and so is canelo's
    by a ton.
     
  4. adokei

    adokei Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,864
    158
    Feb 28, 2016
    ggg wants to go to 54 for floyd.
    can't he do 55 for canelo?
    he will do 68 for froch
    cant he do 64 for ward?
     
  5. Savagekat

    Savagekat TEAM USYK. I AM VERY FEEL! Full Member

    616
    440
    Jan 1, 2008
    As has been stated before, GGG would go down to 154 to fight Floyd in what would be an absolutely massive payday against the cash cow of boxing. He would have to drain himself, but the payday and exposure would compensate for this disadvantage. Canelo holds the title at middleweight. Therefore he should defend it at the middleweight limit of 160 pounds, in all fairness. If Canelo wants to weigh in at 155 that's on him, but he is obviously trying to drain GGG to gain an advantage. Why should GGG be so quick to agree when he is the mandatory? As for moving up to 168 for Froch, once again, Froch was the cash cow of the division at the time and the best British boxer in many years. Money + exposure = worth the risk of moving up to fight one of the top guys in the division in your first fight in said division. Compare that to facing a Ward who had been extremely inactive, was certainly not considered a big draw, and would have posed a risk to GGG that was unequal to the reward of fighting him. Is it really that hard to understand?
     
  6. trumperZ06

    trumperZ06 Active Member Full Member

    1,159
    144
    Aug 8, 2015
    :D GGG's resume speaks for itself.

    GGG's amateur record:

    345-5

    GGG's pro record:

    34-0

    21 KO's

    :admin Trying to disparage his record is an exercise of stupidity.

    ;)
     
  7. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    Ranking the top 5 wins between Golovkin and Kazuto Ioka's career:

    1. IOKA Sithsamerchai
    2. IOKA Reveco II
    3. IOKA Reveco I
    4. IOKA Yaegashi
    5. GOLOVKIN Geale

    Just remember that next time you're talking about who the best fighters in the world at this moment are if you're one of those folks who think Golovkin is among the absolute best or has a wicked revolutionary resume.
     
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    I do just like the way this is written, regardless of the substance, which is certainly more true than not. Chuckled reading it.
     
  9. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,872
    Apr 14, 2009
    Move up?????? I thought he claimed to be WBC MIDDLEWEIGHT Champ ?? Or did the WBC change the weight limit to 155 for middleweights??? Canelo needs to grow a set:patsch
     
  10. sp550i

    sp550i Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,149
    95
    Dec 8, 2009

    lmao what?

    Guerro, Aligiri, Miranda, Rios? Yeah... probably
    Ortiz, Margarito, Judah, Bika? Hell no...
     
  11. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    238,510
    229,387
    Nov 23, 2013
  12. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    238,510
    229,387
    Nov 23, 2013