A few points you have to consider if you think Pacquiao is guilty...

Some people believe he is guilty on the word of a convicted cocaine dealer ,crack head senior ! Or they try and use Conte from balco as some type of source .Conte sold the clear he didn't invent it.

 

Mayweather is full of ****, he saw how easily Cotto got beatdown, so this PED **** got started, even though there has never been rumors or proof of anything, just whooping Cotto's ass, was the whole basis for the accusation.

 

Nobody thinks Manny is on because Floyd said so or any of the mayweathers said so. That meant nothing to me. I thought it was all BS accusations until Manny actually walked away from testing. I was shocked and now I don't think Floyd's accusations are BS at all. Manny made himself questionable by walking away from 30 mill for a teaspoon of blood and killing the fight of the decade.

 

Well have a think about Pac offered testing one minute after the fight, just like cyclist do just like horse racing But all the people on here talk about him refusing to test. What does that mean? That a crack head cocaine dealer has managed to get inside your head.

 

again its not that he just refused the test...thats ok....its the numerous excuses in which all of them wehre down right obsurd...FLoyd or Floyd Sr or whoever else made no difference....PAC and his teams action made things very very relevant.

plus one minute after the fight means nothing IF the drug you use is already gone which there are some that are capable of that. So yes random is the best route...stopping well short of the fight as well.

 

Thing is, he didn't even refuse drug test, just the ones Floyd insisted on.

 

Cyclist are tested year round randomly dumb ass.

 

You can't consider it random testing if you're choosing when you're tested. PED, Steroids, EPO is a science. You can be on and off that **** and get around testing when you know when it's going to happen. If pac is willing to do one test, and he's clean, he should be willing to take them whenever. He should be confident enough to say "fuk it, I'm going to get tested, prove my innocence and knock the fool out." Instead, he's won't take the tests 14 days before the fight but he was willing to do 20? I mean wtf should 7 days matter if you're clean and not hiding anything. Can you rationalize how this looks severely weird?

 

Oh, the one that actually tests you during your training camp.. and not the status quo bull**** that is probably beaten day in and day out. How noble. ****ing picaso.

 

No, that's not ok. A clean man never refuses a test. The excuses is just the icing on the cake.

 

STFU moron...you add nothing to threads..go play negative stereotype elsewhere.:roll:

 

atsch An innocent man doesn't need to prove his innocence when there's never been anything to suggest otherwise.

Go prove you don't have HIV to the entire board....otherwise, why should anyone listen to an HIV having poster?

 

i mean if Pac says no and because the test is Floyd going outside of commision rules...i can accept Pac just saying No with an excuse that hey who are you...i dont have to bow down to that type of stipulation u arent bigger than the sport type excuse..u kno...if he would have just stuck with that....he has a stronger case.....but when u start shootng random excuses...and none of them valid at all....now you have a bigger problem...see what i mean.

Like any other lie in america...ur more likely to get off or understood if you stick to one excuse but the minute you start switching up stories and each story has a whole in it...then you open yourslef up for more interrogation.

 

Maybe he doesn't think he can win without them? He turned down the fight because of drug-taking. The blood was going to weaken the little man.

Yeah, and remember what happened last time Pac lost... he cried.

Maybe

Stamina, strength, functionality, etc. There's no super drug.

I don't think anyone would say it was more drugs than skill. Some just think he's gotten some help. I don't by the way.

Who says he sees openings better? Might help his power a little.

It was.

Yes, this is what I think.

He's not guilty. And you shouldn't think he was... but some just do. They feel there's enough suspicion. It obvoyiously goes beyond the evidence/logic of things so nothing says Pac takes riods.

 

No one really thinks he is guilty.

Not one person in here would bet money on it.