Considering Bumlovkin's resume, I think that ranking is very generous. Personally, I wouldn't have Bumlovkin in the top 10.
Ideally but there have been several points where the lineal Champion has held the title hostage while history passed them by. Off the top of my head: Dempsey 23-26 Gus Lesnevich 41-48 Foreman 94-97 Stevenson 13-present Absolutely. And Golovkin is one of them. By the time of the Chavez Jr fight, Canelo will be one year removed from a fight in the MW limits. Canelo's team claimed he wasn't a MW. How much longer do we pretend Canelo has any claim in the division?
On second thought, maybe he will. Bumlovkin is unquestionably the best Welterweight on earth. LMAO...
Like Bradley will knock out Pacman Hopkins will school Kovaelv Golovkin will not fight Jacobs... Anything else to share, Nostradumbass? What you know of boxing couldn't fill your panties. Keep wishing in one hand and crapping in the other, drown in your own crap, nobody is going to save you.
I have a grand idea. Why don't you post a poll in the Classic Boxing forum asking if Bumlovkin will get to ATG status? I'd love to see the results. LMAO..
Oh that board your lame troll ass got ran out of and hasn't' returned since? I'm a regular down there. He's going to hit all time great status. No fighter in history has ran through contenders like him, unified titles, and not left a mark on history.
Ok so currently they don't have Fury as lineal & have GGG as P4P #6? Here's what you said a few month ago: So are you disagreeing with the TBRB?
Ok, tell me what i am arguing for? Go on.. Point out my logic! Do you have comprehension skills? I am questioning his flaky take on lineal. I haven't put forward an opinion either way.
P4P is subjective so there's nothing to disagree with in that regard. As far as Fury is concerned, if he retired then his title should be declared vacant. It's as simple as that...
Toney 'vacated'. Ok, how do you vacate a CONCEPT? That's all it is.. There is no belt. Lineal: You lay claim by 'beating the man who beat the man' don't you? A chain...